Analyzing the Impacts of International versus Community Based Organizations on Food Security

Abstract

This thesis examines the contrasting outcomes of food assistance programs administered by international organizations and community-based organizations. It delves into the fundamental principles guiding these programs, with international organizations typically prioritizing food security and community-based organizations advocating for food sovereignty. While international organizations possess significant funding and resources, enabling swift implementation of initiatives to address immediate hunger crises, they often fall short in fostering long-term community development. Furthermore, their food aid may lack consideration for cultural appropriateness and nutritional needs, focusing solely on alleviating starvation without addressing underlying issues of malnutrition.

Conversely, community-based organizations operate within the framework of food sovereignty, emphasizing local control over food systems and decision-making processes. Although their initiatives may not yield immediate results due to their reliance on community involvement and acceptance, they are more conducive to sustainable long-term outcomes. These programs foster community development, enhance community independence, and promote food sovereignty by respecting cultural traditions and preferences.

Through a comprehensive analysis of the short and long-term impacts of food assistance programs, this thesis argues that while international organizations excel in providing rapid relief, they often overlook the nuances of local contexts and fail to contribute effectively to lasting community resilience. Conversely, community-based organizations, despite their slower initial progress, emerge as catalysts for sustainable change, fostering empowerment and self-reliance within communities while promoting culturally appropriate and nutritionally sound food systems.