Show simple item record

Evaluating the Effects of Future Land use/Land cover and Agricultural Conservation Practices Scenarios on Streamflow and Water Quality in the Maumee River Watershed

dc.contributor.authorZhao, Yilun
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Runzi
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-04T15:55:05Z
dc.date.issued2024-04
dc.date.submitted2024-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/193040
dc.description.abstractLake Erie's water environment has been a growing concern due to its severe water eutrophication problems which primarily caused by the accumulation of nutrients, particularly phosphorus, from both point and nonpoint source pollutants originating from the Maumee River Watershed (MRW). Despite global studies on the watershed's nutrient dynamics, the complex interactions between land use and land cover (LULC), agricultural conservation practices (ACPs), and their effects on the water environment remain inadequately understood within the MRW. In our study, we designed seven future scenarios involving LULC and ACPs to explore their impacts on the MRW. We employed the Land Change Modeler (LCM) and SWAT+ (Soil and Water Assessment Tool_Plus) to simulate future scenarios of LULC changes and to model the hydrological conditions of the watershed from 2046 to 2065, respectively. ACPs were set up in SWAT+, and we also incorporated meteorological data under the RCP8.5 scenario as future climatic conditions. We selected four hydrological parameters—streamflow (Q), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Soluble Reactive Phosphorus (SRP), and Total Phosphorus (TP)—to analyze the impacts of various LULC and ACP scenarios on MRW. Our research found that ACP scenarios have a more significant impact on MRW's streamflow and water quality, but the effects of LULC changes are also non-negligible. We further analyzed the impacts of different LULC scenarios on the MRW's water environment in greater depth, both temporally and spatially, and found that different LULCs have more pronounced effects at the spatial scale. Although different LULC scenarios can mitigate impacts to varying degrees in different areas, our study also identified that the most significant LULC types on the water environment are open spaces and agricultural lands. Therefore, we suggest that the ideal future development model for MRW should involve managing open spaces reasonably and reducing fertilizer input in agricultural lands, while moderately increasing the proportion of open spaces and medium to high-intensity urban land in urbanized areas and reducing the area of agricultural land in the watershed. This model would effectively improve MRW's streamflow and water quality while accommodating agricultural, economic, and population growth needs.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectLULCen_US
dc.subjectACPen_US
dc.subjectwater qualityen_US
dc.subjectstreamflowen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the Effects of Future Land use/Land cover and Agricultural Conservation Practices Scenarios on Streamflow and Water Quality in the Maumee River Watersheden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Landscape Architecture (MLA) Master of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSchool for Environment and Sustainabilityen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGronewold, Andrew
dc.identifier.uniqnameyilunzhen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/193040/1/Zhao_Yilun_Thesis.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/22685
dc.description.mappingd0a18e86-7d9e-4669-812b-ead353cc4899en_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/22685en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.