Show simple item record

Prevalence, attitudes, and knowledge of in-vehicle technologies and vehicle adaptations among older drivers.

dc.contributor.authorEby, DW
dc.contributor.authorMolnar, LJ
dc.contributor.authorZakrajsek, JS
dc.contributor.authorRyan, LH
dc.contributor.authorZanier, N
dc.contributor.authorLouis, RMS
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-06T19:04:04Z
dc.date.available2024-05-06T19:04:04Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0001-4575
dc.identifier.issn1879-2057
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29407669
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/193083en
dc.descriptionQuery date: 2018-05-17 citation: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=GosQpeoAAAAJ&cstart=100&pagesize=100&citation_for_view=GosQpeoAAAAJ:sfsSB7lKuh0C
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study was to gain a better understanding of the types of in-vehicle technologies being used by older drivers as well as older drivers' use, learning, and perceptions of safety related to these technologies among a large cohort of older drivers at multiple sites in the United States. A secondary purpose was to explore the prevalence of aftermarket vehicle adaptations and how older adults go about making adaptations and how they learn to use them. The study utilized baseline questionnaire data from 2990 participants from the Longitudinal Research on Aging Drivers (LongROAD) study. Fifteen in-vehicle technologies and 12 aftermarket vehicle adaptations were investigated. Overall, 57.2% of participants had at least one advanced technology in their primary vehicle. The number of technologies in a vehicle was significantly related to being male, having a higher income, and having a higher education level. The majority of respondents learned to use these technologies on their own, with “figured-it-out-myself” being reported by 25%–75% of respondents across the technologies. Overall, technologies were always used about 43% of the time, with wide variability among the technologies. Across all technologies, nearly 70% of respondents who had these technologies believed that they made them a safer driver. With regard to vehicle adaptations, less than 9% of respondents had at least one vehicle adaptation present, with the number of adaptations per vehicle ranging from 0 to 4. A large majority did not work with a professional to make or learn about the aftermarket vehicle adaptation.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectAging
dc.subjectMobility
dc.subjectTraffic safety
dc.subjectAccidents, Traffic
dc.subjectAge Factors
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAttitude
dc.subjectAutomobile Driving
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLearning
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMotor Vehicles
dc.subjectPerception
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectSafety
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Factors
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.titlePrevalence, attitudes, and knowledge of in-vehicle technologies and vehicle adaptations among older drivers.
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid29407669
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/193083/2/1-s2.0-S0001457518300289-main.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.022
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/22728
dc.identifier.sourceAccident; analysis and prevention
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2024-05-06T19:04:04Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8650-0628
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9556-1761
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8498-2539
dc.identifier.volume113
dc.identifier.startpage54
dc.identifier.endpage62
dc.identifier.name-orcidEby, DW; 0000-0001-8650-0628
dc.identifier.name-orcidMolnar, LJ; 0000-0002-9556-1761
dc.identifier.name-orcidZakrajsek, JS
dc.identifier.name-orcidRyan, LH; 0000-0001-8498-2539
dc.identifier.name-orcidZanier, N
dc.identifier.name-orcidLouis, RMS
dc.working.doi10.7302/22728en
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.