Show simple item record

Report: NIA Workshop on Measures of Physiologic Resiliencies in Human Aging.

dc.contributor.authorHadley, E
dc.contributor.authorKuchel, G
dc.contributor.authorNewman, A
dc.contributor.authorAllore, H
dc.contributor.authorBartley, J
dc.contributor.authorBergeman, C
dc.contributor.authorBlinov, M
dc.contributor.authorColon-Emeric, C
dc.contributor.authorDabhar, F
dc.contributor.authorDugan, L
dc.contributor.authorDutta, C
dc.contributor.authorEldadah, B
dc.contributor.authorFerrucci, L
dc.contributor.authorKirkland, J
dc.contributor.authorKritchevsky, S
dc.contributor.authorLipsitz, L
dc.contributor.authorNadkarni, N
dc.contributor.authorReed, M
dc.contributor.authorSchmader, K
dc.contributor.authorSierra, F
dc.contributor.authorStudenski, S
dc.contributor.authorVaradhan, R
dc.contributor.authorWalston, J
dc.contributor.authorWhitson, H
dc.contributor.authorYung, R
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-06T19:09:59Z
dc.date.available2024-05-06T19:09:59Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-01
dc.identifier.issn1079-5006
dc.identifier.issn1758-535X
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28475732
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/193087en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Resilience, the ability to resist or recover from adverse effects of a stressor, is of widespread interest in social, psychologic, biologic, and medical research and particularly salient as the capacity to respond to stressors becomes diminished with aging. To date, research on human resilience responses to and factors influencing these responses has been limited. METHODS: The National Institute on Aging convened a workshop in August 2015 on needs for research to improve measures to predict and assess resilience in human aging. Effects of aging-related factors in impairing homeostatic responses were developed from examples illustrating multiple determinants of clinical resilience outcomes. Research directions were identified by workshop participants. RESULTS: Research needs identified included expanded uses of clinical data and specimens in predicting or assessing resilience, and contributions from epidemiological studies in identifying long-term predictors. Better measures, including simulation tests, are needed to assess resilience and its determinants. Mechanistic studies should include exploration of influences of biologic aging processes on human resiliencies. Important resource and infrastructure needs include consensus phenotype definitions of specific resiliencies, capacity to link epidemiological and clinical resilience data, sensor technology to capture responses to stressors, better laboratory animal models of human resiliencies, and new analytic methods to understand the effects of multiple determinants of stress responses. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the focus of care and research to improving the capacity to respond to stressors could benefit older adults in promoting a healthier life span.
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.subjectBiologic aging
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHuman aging
dc.subjectPhysiologic resilience
dc.subjectAdaptation, Psychological
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAging
dc.subjectBehavioral Research
dc.subjectConsensus Development Conferences as Topic
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGeriatric Assessment
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectResilience, Psychological
dc.subjectStress, Psychological
dc.titleReport: NIA Workshop on Measures of Physiologic Resiliencies in Human Aging.
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/193087/2/glx015.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/gerona/glx015
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/22732
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Gerontlogy: Medical Sciences
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2024-05-06T19:09:56Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8181-027X
dc.identifier.volume72
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.startpage980
dc.identifier.endpage990
dc.identifier.name-orcidHadley, E
dc.identifier.name-orcidKuchel, G
dc.identifier.name-orcidNewman, A
dc.identifier.name-orcidAllore, H
dc.identifier.name-orcidBartley, J
dc.identifier.name-orcidBergeman, C
dc.identifier.name-orcidBlinov, M
dc.identifier.name-orcidColon-Emeric, C
dc.identifier.name-orcidDabhar, F
dc.identifier.name-orcidDugan, L
dc.identifier.name-orcidDutta, C
dc.identifier.name-orcidEldadah, B
dc.identifier.name-orcidFerrucci, L
dc.identifier.name-orcidKirkland, J
dc.identifier.name-orcidKritchevsky, S
dc.identifier.name-orcidLipsitz, L
dc.identifier.name-orcidNadkarni, N
dc.identifier.name-orcidReed, M
dc.identifier.name-orcidSchmader, K
dc.identifier.name-orcidSierra, F
dc.identifier.name-orcidStudenski, S
dc.identifier.name-orcidVaradhan, R
dc.identifier.name-orcidWalston, J
dc.identifier.name-orcidWhitson, H
dc.identifier.name-orcidYung, R; 0000-0002-8181-027X
dc.working.doi10.7302/22732en
dc.owningcollnameInternal Medicine, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.