Show simple item record

Rural Women Have a Prolonged Recovery Process after Esophagectomy

dc.contributor.authorSchroeder, J
dc.contributor.authorLagisetty, K
dc.contributor.authorLynch, W
dc.contributor.authorLin, J
dc.contributor.authorChang, AC
dc.contributor.authorReddy, RM
dc.coverage.spatialSwitzerland
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-12T13:18:28Z
dc.date.available2024-05-12T13:18:28Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-01
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38539414
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/193143en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Gender and geographic access to care play a large role in health disparities in esophageal cancer care. The aim of our study was to evaluate disparities in peri-operative outcomes for patients undergoing esophagectomy based on gender and geographic location. Methods: A retrospective cohort of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent esophagectomy from 2003 to 2022 was identified and analyzed based on gender and county, which were aggregated into existing state-level “metropolitan” versus “rural” designations. The demographics, pre-operative treatment, surgical complications, post-operative outcomes, and length of stay (LOS) of each group were analyzed using chi-squared, paired t-tests and single-factor ANOVA. Results: Of the 1545 patients, men (83.6%) and women (16.4%) experienced similar rates of post-operative complications, but women experienced significantly longer hospital (p = 0.002) and ICU (p = 0.03) LOSs as compared with their male counterparts, with no differences in 30-day mortality. When separated by geographic criteria, rural women were further outliers, with significantly longer hospital LOSs (p < 0.001) and higher rates of ICU admission (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Rural female patients undergoing esophagectomy were more likely to have a longer inpatient recovery process compared with their female metropolitan or male counterparts, suggesting a need for more targeted interventions in this population.
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectesophageal cancer
dc.subjectesophagectomy
dc.subjectgender disparity
dc.subjectgeographic access to care
dc.subjecthealth disparities
dc.subjectperi-operative outcomes and complications
dc.titleRural Women Have a Prolonged Recovery Process after Esophagectomy
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/193143/2/Rural Women Have a Prolonged Recovery Process after Esophagectomy.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers16061078
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/22788
dc.identifier.sourceCancers
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2024-05-12T13:18:27Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7241-5227
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4733-0659
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9506-0425
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4337-5051
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage1078
dc.identifier.name-orcidSchroeder, J
dc.identifier.name-orcidLagisetty, K; 0000-0002-7241-5227
dc.identifier.name-orcidLynch, W
dc.identifier.name-orcidLin, J; 0000-0003-4733-0659
dc.identifier.name-orcidChang, AC; 0000-0001-9506-0425
dc.identifier.name-orcidReddy, RM; 0000-0002-4337-5051
dc.working.doi10.7302/22788en
dc.owningcollnameSurgery, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.