Show simple item record

Barriers and Communications Preferences of Rural Populations: A Scoping Review

dc.contributor.authorHenly, Megan
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Shreya
dc.contributor.authorBrucker, Debra L.
dc.contributor.authorHoutenville, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorNye-Lengerman, Kelly
dc.contributor.authorBach, Stacia
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-27T15:35:05Z
dc.date.available2024-06-27T15:35:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-07
dc.identifier.citationHenly, Megan, Shreya Paul, Debra L. Brucker, Andrew Houtenville, Kelly Nye-Lengerman, and Stacia Bach. 2023. “Barriers and communications preferences of rural populations: A Scoping Review.” Ann Arbor, MI. University of Michigan Retirement and Disability Research Center (MRDRC) Working Paper; MRDRC WP 2023-465. https://mrdrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/papers/pdf/wp465.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/193965en
dc.description.abstractEnrollment in federal and state government programs is substantially lower for some eligible demographic subpopulations, particularly persons living in rural areas. Barriers faced when seeking program benefits may, in part, explain such differences in enrollment. The purpose of this paper is to identify barriers faced by prospective rural beneficiaries and how they prefer to communicate with government agencies and, in doing so, inform Social Security Administration (SSA) disability programs processes and communication strategies. This paper reports the results of a scoping literature review of government program communication strategies and how knowledge of SSA and other government programs varies by sociodemographic groups and what this says about barriers facing those in rural communities. Following a robust scoping review process — the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we identified articles that mentioned key phrases related to federal programs, communication, and rurality across four databases. English-language articles were included if published on topics related to our research questions between 2012 and 2022, reported on data collected in 2010 or later, and were about U.S. programs. Two of the authors each screened and reached consensus on 278 abstracts/titles and then 72 full texts to identify those that were in scope. As a result, we identified 16 articles for inclusion in this review. Three primary themes emerged: the knowledge and enrollment impact of changes to communication approaches; the importance of community-specific context; and barriers specific to communicating with rural residents and other underserved communities.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Social Security Administration through the Michigan Retirement and Disability Research Center award RDR18000002-04, UM23-Q2en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMRDRC WP 2023-465en_US
dc.subjectcommunications; service-related barriers; rural communitiesen_US
dc.titleBarriers and Communications Preferences of Rural Populations: A Scoping Reviewen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPopulation and Demography
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan Retirement and Disability Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of New Hampshireen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of New Hampshireen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of New Hampshireen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of New Hampshireen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of New Hampshireen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of New Hampshireen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/193965/1/wp465.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/23447
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of wp465.pdf : working paper
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/23447en_US
dc.owningcollnameRetirement and Disability Research Center, Michigan (MRDRC)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.