Mixed-method Study on Information, Communications, and Access to Government Benefits among Rural Populations
dc.contributor.author | Rabinovich, Lila | |
dc.contributor.author | Perez-Arce, Francisco | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-28T16:12:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-28T16:12:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rabinovich, Lila, Francisco Perez-Arce, and Tabasa Ozawa. 2023. “Mixed-method Study on Information, Communications, and Access to Government Benefits among Rural Populations.” Ann Arbor, MI. University of Michigan Retirement and Disability Research Center (MRDRC) Working Paper; MRDRC WP 2023-474. https://mrdrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/papers/pdf/wp474.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/193982 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Rural communities face specific challenges to accessing information about government safety net programs that can provide essential assistance to reduce urban-rural inequalities and contribute to the rural economy. This mixed-methods study examines these challenges, and preferred methods for outreach efforts to increase program awareness and take-up in rural areas. Our qualitative findings align broadly with previous research that suggests distance to in-person resources and unreliable internet access are critical obstacles in rural areas. These challenges are exacerbated for groups with more vulnerabilities, including those on low-incomes, the elderly, those experiencing disease or disability, compromising their ability to access information, benefit claim support, and, in the case of disability claims, the required medical records. Nevertheless, quantitative analyses reveal that, despite having lower internet literacy, rural populations overall have similar access to certain Social Security information resources as their urban peers, notably the Social Security Statement. Still, a large number of rural respondents have low levels of information and access and, overall, rural areas exhibit a strong preference for print and in-person Social Security information relative to nonrural respondents. Government agencies’ expansion of online access to programs and information to counteract the barriers to in-person access in rural areas may be only partially effective, since internet connectivity and literacy remain a challenge for some, especially in more disadvantaged areas. Native American reservations may be of particular concern. Moreover, the focus on online access may be insufficient for rural communities where many continue to prefer other modes of communication. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | The Social Security Administration through the Michigan Retirement and Disability Research Center award RDR18000002-05, UM23-Q2 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | MRDRC WP 2023-474 | en_US |
dc.subject | rural communities, Native American reservations, Social Security, benefits, communications | en_US |
dc.title | Mixed-method Study on Information, Communications, and Access to Government Benefits among Rural Populations | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Population and Demography | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Southern California, Center for Economic and Social Research | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/193982/1/wp474.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/23464 | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of wp474.pdf : working paper | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/23464 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Retirement and Disability Research Center, Michigan (MRDRC) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.