Show simple item record

Mixed-methods Study on Work-disabled Adults Who Do Not Apply for Social Security Disability Benefits

dc.contributor.authorRabinovich, Lila
dc.contributor.authorJunghaenel, Doerte U.
dc.contributor.authorOzawa, Tabasa
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-01T13:55:24Z
dc.date.available2024-07-01T13:55:24Z
dc.date.issued2023-10
dc.identifier.citationRabinovich, Lila, Doerte U. Junghaenel, and Tabasa Ozawa. 2023. “Mixed-methods Study on Work-Disabled Adults Who Do Not Apply for Social Security Disability Benefits.” Ann Arbor, MI. University of Michigan Retirement and Disability Research Center (MRDRC) Working Paper; MRDRC WP 2023-477. https://mrdrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/papers/pdf/wp477.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/193999en
dc.description.abstractTake-up gaps in safety net programs, which have been long documented in the United States and elsewhere, are an important policy question as nontake-up compromises the equity objectives and efficacy of programs. The Social Security Disability program is an example of this: More than 20 million adults report a work disability, but only around 11 million currently receive disability benefits through the Social Security Disability Insurance or Supplemental Security Income programs. This comprehensive mixed-methods study examines the characteristics and decision-making around benefits applications among adults with self-reported work disability who have never applied for disability benefits. Analysis of survey data suggests that the availability of personal and socioeconomic resources, including younger age, educational attainment, spousal support, and income may act as buffers to feeling the need to apply for disability benefits. Greater cognitive resources, in particular quantitative and verbal reasoning skills, were associated with a greater likelihood of not applying. Qualitatively, we find that high transaction costs involved in disability applications coupled with the widespread perception of low approval rates may be a critical deterrent for eligible individuals. Uncertain and lengthy medical processes after disability onset were also frequently reported as a central deterrent. Stigma about receiving disability benefits does not emerge as a factor in application behavior, although a change in self-concept involving an adjustment to benefit-receiving, work-disabled status was cited as a deterrent to claiming. These insights could inform targeted interventions to reduce barriers to take-up of benefits among potentially eligible adults.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Social Security Administration through the Michigan Retirement and Disability Research Center award RDR18000002-05, UM23-08en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMRDRC WP 2023-477en_US
dc.subjectdisability; decision-making; mixed-methodsen_US
dc.titleMixed-methods Study on Work-disabled Adults Who Do Not Apply for Social Security Disability Benefitsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPopulation and Demography
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Southern California, Center for Economic and Social Researchen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Southern California, Center for Economic and Social Researchen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Southern California, Center for Economic and Social Researchen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/193999/1/wp477.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/23481
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of wp477.pdf : working paper
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/23481en_US
dc.owningcollnameRetirement and Disability Research Center, Michigan (MRDRC)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.