Block By Block: Equitable Sales Strategies for Detroit's Claytown, Nardin Park, and Northeast
dc.contributor.author | Carley, Cameron | |
dc.contributor.author | Hunter, Kayla | |
dc.contributor.author | Kollar, Sam | |
dc.contributor.author | Lockman, Janney | |
dc.contributor.author | Qiao, Jiawen | |
dc.contributor.author | Simmons, Brittany | |
dc.contributor.author | Streeter, Sherelle | |
dc.contributor.author | Villegas, Rebeca | |
dc.contributor.author | Wooldridge, James | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-09T14:04:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-09T14:04:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/194062 | en |
dc.description | Faculty Advisors: Eric Dueweke and Sam Butler | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The Detroit Land Bank Authority (DLBA) owns nearly 90,000 properties throughout the city of Detroit. Of these properties, some 25% contain residential structures. DLBA-owned residential structures are largely concentrated in areas of the city with the highest rates of vacancy and lowest home values. To supplement its existing sales programs, the DLBA sought creative disposition strategies to help return vacant houses to productive use in three of the city’s most challenging housing markets: Claytown, Nardin Park, and Northeast. A nine-member team of urban and regional planning graduate students at the University of Michigan executed a three-pronged approach to research and create socially just sales strategies for the DLBA: we analyzed area demographics, housing markets, and submarkets in the three geographic areas; we sifted through case studies of communities facing similar housing market challenges; and most importantly, we conducted interviews with residents, community organization leaders, and Detroit-based investors and lenders to obtain local knowledge. These efforts culminated in the creation of six strategies and several attendant recommendations. Undergirding these recommendations is a block typology analysis, created for this report. Ultimately, the team concluded that the DLBA should focus on block-level sales strategies. To inform our suggested strategies, we developed a block typology analysis, which categorizes blocks based on the percentage of DLBA properties and the percentage of vacant lots on each block. Two months into this project, COVID-19 led to physical distancing efforts and DLBA budget cuts. The full social and economic impacts of the pandemic remain unclear. While some of the recommendations in this report may not prove implementable in the near term, we encourage the DLBA to begin community engagement efforts now. No single overarching policy will ‘solve’ the slow sales issue in Detroit’s challenged housing markets. A block-level approach nevertheless represents a way forward. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | vacant property | en_US |
dc.subject | land bank | en_US |
dc.subject | Detroit | en_US |
dc.title | Block By Block: Equitable Sales Strategies for Detroit's Claytown, Nardin Park, and Northeast | en_US |
dc.type | Project | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Urban and Regional Planning | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Architecture | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Arts | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Architecture and Urban Planning, College of (TCAUP) | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/194062/1/2020_Block-by-Block.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/23507 | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/23507 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Architecture and Urban Planning, A. Alfred Taubman College of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.