Show simple item record

Opening the Black Box of Family-Based Treatments: An Artificial Intelligence Framework to Examine Therapeutic Alliance and Therapist Empathy

dc.contributor.authorCunningham, PB
dc.contributor.authorGilmore, J
dc.contributor.authorNaar, S
dc.contributor.authorPreston, SD
dc.contributor.authorEubanks, CF
dc.contributor.authorHubig, NC
dc.contributor.authorMcClendon, J
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, S
dc.contributor.authorRyan-Pettes, S
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-01T16:26:07Z
dc.date.available2024-08-01T16:26:07Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-01
dc.identifier.issn1096-4037
dc.identifier.issn1573-2827
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37676364
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/194140en
dc.description.abstractThe evidence-based treatment (EBT) movement has primarily focused on core intervention content or treatment fidelity and has largely ignored practitioner skills to manage interpersonal process issues that emerge during treatment, especially with difficult-to-treat adolescents (delinquent, substance-using, medical non-adherence) and those of color. A chief complaint of “real world” practitioners about manualized treatments is the lack of correspondence between following a manual and managing microsocial interpersonal processes (e.g. negative affect) that arise in treating “real world clients.” Although family-based EBTs share core similarities (e.g. focus on family interactions, emphasis on practitioner engagement, family involvement), most of these treatments do not have an evidence base regarding common implementation and treatment process problems that practitioners experience in delivering particular models, especially in mid-treatment when demands on families to change their behavior is greatest in treatment – a lack that characterizes the field as a whole. Failure to effectively address common interpersonal processes with difficult-to-treat families likely undermines treatment fidelity and sustained use of EBTs, treatment outcome, and contributes to treatment dropout and treatment nonadherence. Recent advancements in wearables, sensing technologies, multivariate time-series analyses, and machine learning allow scientists to make significant advancements in the study of psychotherapy processes by looking “under the skin” of the provider–client interpersonal interactions that define therapeutic alliance, empathy, and empathic accuracy, along with the predictive validity of these therapy processes (therapeutic alliance, therapist empathy) to treatment outcome. Moreover, assessment of these processes can be extended to develop procedures for training providers to manage difficult interpersonal processes while maintaining a physiological profile that is consistent with astute skills in psychotherapeutic processes. This paper argues for opening the “black box” of therapy to advance the science of evidence-based psychotherapy by examining the clinical interior of evidence-based treatments to develop the next generation of audit- and feedback- (i.e., systemic review of professional performance) supervision systems.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectChild and adolescence family-based treatments
dc.subjectMachine-learning
dc.subjectPsychotherapy process science
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence
dc.subjectEmpathy
dc.subjectPsychotherapy
dc.subjectTherapeutic Alliance
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.titleOpening the Black Box of Family-Based Treatments: An Artificial Intelligence Framework to Examine Therapeutic Alliance and Therapist Empathy
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid37676364
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/194140/2/Opening the Black Box of Family-Based Treatments An Artificial Intelligence Framework to Examine Therapeutic Alliance and Th.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10567-023-00451-6
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/23584
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Child and Family Psychology Review
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2024-08-01T16:26:05Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0814-2874
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2733-6108
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage975
dc.identifier.endpage993
dc.identifier.name-orcidCunningham, PB; 0000-0003-0814-2874
dc.identifier.name-orcidGilmore, J
dc.identifier.name-orcidNaar, S
dc.identifier.name-orcidPreston, SD; 0000-0002-2733-6108
dc.identifier.name-orcidEubanks, CF
dc.identifier.name-orcidHubig, NC
dc.identifier.name-orcidMcClendon, J
dc.identifier.name-orcidGhosh, S
dc.identifier.name-orcidRyan-Pettes, S
dc.working.doi10.7302/23584en
dc.owningcollnamePsychology, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.