Clean Energy Technology Adoption Roadmap
dc.contributor.author | Crane, Sarah | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilson, Steve | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-02T17:32:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-02T17:32:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/194172 | en |
dc.description | This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Accelerating the adoption of technologies that decrease energy use during production is a critical avenue to achieving decarbonization goals. These “clean energy technologies” are defined as the installation of any hardware, software, or product that reduces energy consumption and/or increases energy efficiency in the manufacturing process compared to previous iterations. The research team evaluated CETA behind the meter in two areas: process efficiencies and fuel switching for energy intensive processes. Process efficiencies encompass energy efficiencies in the process of manufacturing a product. Fuel switching references the changing of the energy source for a company’s on-site energy generation for high- energy processes. The findings outlined in this report are a synthesis of 40 interviews with companies and industry stakeholders and desktop review of more than 56 resources. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy and the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy through Energy Services under Award Number DE-EE0007478. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | technology adoption | en_US |
dc.subject | clean energy | en_US |
dc.subject | manufacturing | en_US |
dc.subject | value chain | en_US |
dc.subject | process efficiencies | en_US |
dc.subject | fuel switching | en_US |
dc.title | Clean Energy Technology Adoption Roadmap | en_US |
dc.type | Technical Report | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/194172/1/U-M Clean Energy Tech Adoption Report.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/23616 | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of U-M Clean Energy Tech Adoption Report.pdf : Final Report | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/23616 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Economic Growth Institute |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.