Interweaving Equity in Place-based Economic Development Programs: An early analysis of equity within the Build Back Better Challenge Awardees
dc.contributor.author | Crane, Sarah | |
dc.contributor.author | Fenstermaker, Emma | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-02T17:39:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-02T17:39:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/194178 | en |
dc.description.abstract | The values and approaches to equitable growth are at the forefront of public discourse, both in growing support and opposition in recent years. However, in the midst of this, local economic development leaders are actively advancing equity by successfully integrating it into their organizations, programs, and communities. One specific federally-funded program, the Build Back Better Regional Challenge, is both spurring and supporting these efforts in equitable place-based economic development. This approach at the federal level is a departure from more traditional, top-down economic development strategies, encouraging localities to take the lead and ownership in their economic trajectory. Additionally, BBBRC emphasizes equity and engaging local communities, especially with underserved and underrepresented populations, in economic development programs. Historically, economic development programs often only informed underserved and underrepresented communities, at best, or completely failed to engage, at worst. The design of BBBRC seeks to alter the blueprint for economic development through interweaving equity in place-based programs. Through the BBBRC, the 21 awarded coalitions advance equitable place-based program development, coalition structures, and project activities. The research team gathered data for this report through interviews and program documentation with the goal of understanding the common and unique practices between coalitions. This comparative approach allows us to document the multiple approaches to equity and identify key themes between the coalitions. For this project, the research team did not have a static definition of equity, but instead centered how coalitions were defining equity and its components. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This report was prepared by the University of Michigan Economic Growth Institute using Federal funds under agreement ED22HDQ3070128 from the Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Economic Development Administration or the U.S. Department of Commerce. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Equity | en_US |
dc.subject | Build Back Better Regional Challenge | en_US |
dc.subject | Economic Development Administration | en_US |
dc.subject | economic development strategies | en_US |
dc.subject | place-based economic development | en_US |
dc.subject | inclusive equitable outcomes | en_US |
dc.title | Interweaving Equity in Place-based Economic Development Programs: An early analysis of equity within the Build Back Better Challenge Awardees | en_US |
dc.type | Technical Report | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Economic Growth Institute | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/194178/1/BBBRC Report #1 Final.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/23622 | |
dc.description.mapping | -1 | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of BBBRC Report #1 Final.pdf : Report | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/23622 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Economic Growth Institute |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.