Where Harris and Trump Stand on Science and Technology Policy Issues
dc.contributor.author | Pitcher, Farah | |
dc.contributor.author | Nguyen, Terry | |
dc.contributor.author | Sibley, Txai | |
dc.contributor.author | Colls-Xatart, Xantal | |
dc.contributor.author | Coyne, Rebecca | |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, Sabrina Chun Yan | |
dc.contributor.author | Dowdle, Will | |
dc.contributor.author | Grewel, Amant | |
dc.contributor.author | Kelly, Riley | |
dc.contributor.author | Shannon, Austin | |
dc.contributor.author | Shastri, Vaidehi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-01T15:20:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-01T15:20:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-10-14 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/195439 | en |
dc.description | Across the United States, there are significant efforts to encourage university students to vote. University of Michigan, for example, has created UMICH Votes to increase student voter turnout. These efforts are succeeding—student voting rose from 52% in the 2016 presidential election to 66% in 2020. However, students in STEM fields consistently vote at lower rates than their counterparts. To help address this deficit, students involved with University of Michigan’s Science, Technology, and Public Policy (STPP) Program at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, have summarized the two main presidential candidates’ positions on issues likely to be of interest to STEM students: scientific research funding, technology policy, immigration policy, energy policy, environmental policy, and environmental justice policy. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Across the United States, there are significant efforts to encourage university students to vote. University of Michigan, for example, has created UMICH Votes to increase student voter turnout. These efforts are succeeding—student voting rose from 52% in the 2016 presidential election to 66% in 2020. However, students in STEM fields consistently vote at lower rates than their counterparts. To help address this deficit, students involved with University of Michigan’s Science, Technology, and Public Policy (STPP) Program at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, have summarized the two main presidential candidates’ positions on issues likely to be of interest to STEM students: scientific research funding, technology policy, immigration policy, energy policy, environmental policy, and environmental justice policy. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Harris, Trump, science policy, technology, immigration, energy, environmental, justice | en_US |
dc.title | Where Harris and Trump Stand on Science and Technology Policy Issues | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Government, Politics and Law | |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/195439/1/harris-trump-stands-on-science-technology-policy-issues-2024(4).pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/24633 | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of harris-trump-stands-on-science-technology-policy-issues-2024(4).pdf : Policy Memo | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/24633 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Science, Technology, and Public Policy (STPP) program |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.