Introduction to special issue. Contextualising Global Flows of Competency-based Education: Polysemy, Hybridity and Silences
dc.contributor.author | Anderson-Levitt, Kathryn | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-15T18:06:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-15T18:06:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11-16 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0305-0068 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/195599 | en |
dc.description | This introduction to a theme issue has been published online, open access, by the journal. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This essay introduces the special issue on competencies or ‘twenty-first century skills’ as learning goals promoted by the OECD and other international organisations. The studies in this issue trace pathways through which competency-based approaches have been incorporated into national reforms, and explore how reform advocates, policy makers, educators, and experts have imagined ‘key competencies’ for compulsory education. Cases examine reforms in particular countries – Sweden, France, Russia, Kosovo, the United States, Uruguay, and China – as well as conceptualisations of competencies, ‘civic competencies’ and ‘global competence’ shaped by international experts. Based on these studies, this essay argues that the concept of competencies, central to the development of the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), is a polysemous notion that has led to hybrid forms of discourse and policy implementation. It also highlights the significance of reform processes and specific actors in diverse settings, illuminating the complexity and contingency of competency-based reforms. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | education reform | en_US |
dc.subject | education policy | en_US |
dc.subject | global education reform | en_US |
dc.subject | 21st century skills | en_US |
dc.subject | competencies | en_US |
dc.subject | comparative education | en_US |
dc.subject | OECD | en_US |
dc.title | Introduction to special issue. Contextualising Global Flows of Competency-based Education: Polysemy, Hybridity and Silences | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Anthropology and Archaeology | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Behavioral Sciences: Anthropology, Department of (UM-Dearborn) | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Dearborn | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/195599/1/Introduction contextualising global flows of c.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/24671 | |
dc.identifier.source | Comparative Education | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-5412-1818 | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of Introduction contextualising global flows of c.pdf : Introduction to theme issue, published online, open access, by the journal. | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Anderson-Levitt, Kathryn; 0000-0001-5412-1818 | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/24671 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Behavioral Sciences: Anthropology, Department of (UM-Dearborn) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.