Show simple item record

Comparison of perioperative adverse events following suburethral sling placement using synthetic mesh, autologous rectus fascia, and autologous fascia lata in a national surgical registry

dc.contributor.authorHong, CX
dc.contributor.authorSon, Y
dc.contributor.authorPatel, VJ
dc.contributor.authorLince, K
dc.contributor.authorGupta, P
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-15T18:26:05Z
dc.date.available2024-11-15T18:26:05Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-01
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38426785
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/195609en
dc.description.abstractAims: To assess and compare 30-day perioperative adverse events following suburethral sling surgery using synthetic mesh, autologous rectus fascia, and autologous fascia lata in women. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent fascial or synthetic sling placement for stress urinary incontinence between 2008 and 2021 using the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients undergoing each type of sling procedure. Multivariable regression analysis with stepwise regression was used to assess the odds of composite adverse events (e.g., urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, pulmonary embolism, and other reportable events) between cohorts. Results: Of the 41 533 female patients who underwent isolated suburethral sling placement without concurrent procedures, 41 292 (99.4%) received a synthetic mesh sling, and 241 (0.6%) received an autologous facial sling. In the fascial sling cohort, 160 (66.4%) underwent rectus fascia harvest and 81 (33.6%) underwent fascia lata harvest. Sling surgeries involving autologous fascia were associated with increased odds of adverse events compared to those involving synthetic mesh, even after adjusting for confounders (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.56–5.15). Compared to fascial slings from rectus fascia, slings from fascia lata were associated with increased odds of composite adverse events (aOR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.03–4.04). However, with the exclusion of urinary tract infections, the adverse event rate was similar between slings using the two fascial harvest techniques (aOR: 1.93, 95% CI: 0.81–4.63). Conclusions: In this retrospective database study, suburethral sling surgeries using autologous fascia were independently associated with a 3.6-fold increase in odds of 30-day perioperative adverse events compared to sling surgeries using synthetic mesh.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectfascial sling
dc.subjectmidurethral sling
dc.subjectsling
dc.subjectstress urinary incontinence
dc.subjectsuburethral sling
dc.subjecttension‐free vaginal tape
dc.subjectvaginal mesh
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectSuburethral Slings
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectFascia Lata
dc.subjectSurgical Mesh
dc.subjectUrinary Incontinence, Stress
dc.subjectRegistries
dc.titleComparison of perioperative adverse events following suburethral sling placement using synthetic mesh, autologous rectus fascia, and autologous fascia lata in a national surgical registry
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid38426785
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/195609/2/Hong2024_Comparison of perioperative adverse events following suburethral sling.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.25434
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/24681
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamics
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2024-11-15T18:26:05Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1294-4132
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9528-3191
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Hong2024_Comparison of perioperative adverse events following suburethral sling.pdf : Published version
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage925
dc.identifier.endpage934
dc.identifier.name-orcidHong, CX; 0000-0003-1294-4132
dc.identifier.name-orcidSon, Y
dc.identifier.name-orcidPatel, VJ
dc.identifier.name-orcidLince, K
dc.identifier.name-orcidGupta, P; 0000-0002-9528-3191
dc.working.doi10.7302/24681en
dc.owningcollnameObstetrics and Gynecology, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.