Show simple item record

Decreasing Utilization of Vaginal Hysterectomy in the United States: An Analysis by Candidacy for Vaginal Approach

dc.contributor.authorHong, CX
dc.contributor.authorO’Leary, M
dc.contributor.authorHorner, W
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, PC
dc.contributor.authorHarvie, HS
dc.contributor.authorKamdar, NS
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, DM
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-15T18:26:53Z
dc.date.available2024-11-15T18:26:53Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462
dc.identifier.issn1433-3023
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39240369
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/195610en
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and Hypothesis: The objective was to assess trends in hysterectomy routes by patients who are likely and unlikely candidates for a vaginal approach. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent vaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic/robotics-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy between 2017 and 2020 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients undergoing hysterectomy for a primary diagnosis of benign uterine pathology, dysplasia, abnormal uterine bleeding, or pelvic floor disorders were eligible for inclusion. Patients who were parous, had no history of pelvic or abdominal surgery, and had a uterine weight ≤ 280 g on pathology were considered likely candidates for vaginal hysterectomy based on an algorithm developed to guide the surgical approach. Average annual changes in the proportion of likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates and route of hysterectomy were assessed using logistic regression. Results: Of the 77,829 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 13,738 (17.6%) were likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates. Among likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates, the rate of vaginal hysterectomy was 34.5%, whereas among unlikely vaginal hysterectomy candidates, it was 14.1%. The overall vaginal hysterectomy rate decreased −1.2%/year (p < 0.01). This decreasing trend was nearly twice as rapid among likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates (−1.9%/year, p <.01) compared with unlikely vaginal hysterectomy candidates (−1.1%/year, P < 0.01); the difference in trends was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The rate of vaginal hysterectomy performed for eligible indications decreased between 2017 and 2020 in a national surgical registry. This negative trend was more pronounced among patients who were likely candidates for vaginal hysterectomy based on favorable parity, surgical history, and uterine weight.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.subjectGynecologic surgery
dc.subjectHysterectomy
dc.subjectSurgical database
dc.subjectTrends
dc.subjectVaginal hysterectomy
dc.titleDecreasing Utilization of Vaginal Hysterectomy in the United States: An Analysis by Candidacy for Vaginal Approach
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid39240369
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/195610/2/Hong2024_Decreasing_Utilization_Vaginal_Hysterectomy.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-024-05908-y
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/24682
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Urogynecology Journal
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2024-11-15T18:26:52Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1294-4132
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9077-0409
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1898-1594
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7403-4586
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Hong2024_Decreasing_Utilization_Vaginal_Hysterectomy.pdf : Published version
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.endpage9
dc.identifier.name-orcidHong, CX; 0000-0003-1294-4132
dc.identifier.name-orcidO’Leary, M
dc.identifier.name-orcidHorner, W
dc.identifier.name-orcidSchmidt, PC; 0000-0002-9077-0409
dc.identifier.name-orcidHarvie, HS
dc.identifier.name-orcidKamdar, NS; 0000-0002-1898-1594
dc.identifier.name-orcidMorgan, DM; 0000-0001-7403-4586
dc.owningcollnameObstetrics and Gynecology, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.