Show simple item record

Election Security Perspectives From Intelligence and Election Cybersecurity Experts

dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Terry
dc.contributor.authorSherry, Molly
dc.contributor.authorSoonavala, Cyrus
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-18T20:52:48Z
dc.date.available2025-02-18T20:52:48Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-17
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/196554en
dc.description.abstractDeterring election interference remains an ongoing challenge for national security institutions and election administration agencies. Interference is defined as “any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions.” The primary areas of concern are voter registration databases, voting machines, and outdated election infrastructure standards that are vulnerable to malign foreign interference. Javed Ali, associate professor of practice at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, and J. Alex Halderman, the Bredt Family Professor of Engineering and a professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, agreed to share their expert insights into the state of U.S. election security. Professor Ali expressed his confidence in the intelligence community and in improvements made to cyberinfrastructure and inter-agency coordination to deter cybersecurity threats. Professor Halderman encouraged greater state, local, and federal agency cooperation to implement uniform election infrastructure standards. He also urged election administration agencies to implement both defensive and deterrent measures to counter any election interference attempts. An evolving threat landscape presents a variety of security challenges, but Americans can be confident that their vote was safeguarded this election cycle. Despite known attempts at interference, they were not large or effective enough to alter election results.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFord Foundationen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectelection security, cybersecurity, election interference, voting machines, voter registrationen_US
dc.titleElection Security Perspectives From Intelligence and Election Cybersecurity Expertsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Law
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/196554/1/STPP-Election-Security.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/25216
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/25216en_US
dc.owningcollnameScience, Technology, and Public Policy (STPP) program


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.