The Impact of Labor Unions in Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review Protocol
dc.contributor.author | Ratliff, Hannah C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Czerwinski, Megan | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Florence | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-25T15:15:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-25T15:15:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-02-25 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/196581 | en |
dc.description | A scoping review protocol. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to map evidence on the impact of unions in nursing homes on employee, resident, and facility outcomes. Introduction: Fifty-two percent of nursing home staff turnover annually; however, turnover rates decrease by 9% in counties with predominately unionized nursing homes. Labor unions may provide structural, organizational, and policy-related solutions to foster a sustainable healthcare workforce. Healthcare labor unions are associated with improved financial and employment outcomes for workers, and improved health-related outcomes for both workers and patients. Previous reviews have examined labor unions across healthcare settings representing specific job types (i.e., nurses and direct-care workers), the current state of evidence regarding the impact of labor unions representing any job type in nursing homes remains unclear. Inclusion criteria: This review will include studies on labor unions in United States nursing homes that represent any job type. We will focus on studies that report outcomes for employees, residents, and/or facilities. Methods: Relevant sources will be identified using PubMed.gov, Embase.com and CINAHL complete (EBSCO), Business Source Complete (EBSCO), Health Policy Reference Center (EBSCO), ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest), Scopus.com, and Web of Science. The search will be limited to peer-reviewed empirical studies published in English and focused on labor unions in nursing home settings; grey literature will not be included. Covidence will be used to screen studies for inclusion criteria. Study characteristics will be extracted from each article based on prespecified domains. Two authors will independently screen and review selected articles, with any disagreements resolved by an additional reviewer. The review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist for reporting scoping reviews. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.rights | CC0 1.0 Universal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | * |
dc.subject | collective bargaining | en_US |
dc.subject | labor relations | en_US |
dc.subject | healthcare workforce | en_US |
dc.subject | skilled nursing | en_US |
dc.subject | workplace dynamics | en_US |
dc.title | The Impact of Labor Unions in Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review Protocol | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychiatry | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Psychiatry | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Environment and Sustainability | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Institute for Health Policy and Innovation | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Health Behaviour and Clinical Sciences | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/196581/2/2025_02_25_ScR_Protocol.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/25243 | |
dc.description.mapping | -1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-8331-3560 | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 2025_02_25_ScR_Protocol.pdf : Scoping review protocol. | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Ratliff, Hannah C.; 0000-0001-8331-3560 | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/25243 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Psychiatry, Department of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.