View Item 

Show simple item record

Current status of the Progymnospermopsida
dc.contributor.authorBeck, Charles B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T16:31:12Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T16:31:12Z
dc.date.issued1976-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationBeck, Charles B. (1976/01)."Current status of the Progymnospermopsida." Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 21(1): 5-23. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/21850>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V6W-48C762G-77/2/dcc2a3ffa4664c3226b3d107bc5c5f43en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/21850
dc.description.abstractThe three progymnosperm orders, Aneurophytales, Protopityales, and Archaeopteridales, are characterized and analyzed. The possibility that some of the apparent taxonomic diversity of the Aneurophytales and Archaeopteridales might reflect developmental variation is considered as well as the probability that much of it reflects evolutionary change. A detailed discussion of the phylogenetic position of the Progymnospermopsida concludes the paper.en_US
dc.format.extent1318490 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleCurrent status of the Progymnospermopsidaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropology and Archaeologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Botany, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/21850/1/0000253.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-6667(76)90020-8en_US
dc.identifier.sourceReview of Palaeobotany and Palynologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
0000253.pdf
Size:
1.257MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.