Show simple item record

Levels of technicality in scientific communication

dc.contributor.authorTagliacozzo, Renataen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T16:31:51Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T16:31:51Z
dc.date.issued1976en_US
dc.identifier.citationTagliacozzo, Renata (1976)."Levels of technicality in scientific communication." Information Processing & Management 12(2): 95-110. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/21872>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VC8-468H9VB-BX/2/77df04ec5f016b01892d7b845cddab2fen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/21872
dc.description.abstractThe large number of specialized languages which have resulted from the rapid development of modern science and technology, although meant to facilitate communication within each area of specialization, may create barriers to understanding between different levels of competence and specialization. Ways have to be found for identifying and describing the fundamental features of technical and scientific writing and for clarifying its differences from what is called "common" language.In this paper, the style of scientific writing has been discussed from the point of view of its lexical, semantic, and use characteristics. On the assumption that the level of technicality of a scientific publication is responding to the degree of training and specialization of its readership, a comparison was made between the language of a group of articles taken from the Scientific American and the language of articles given as references by them. Distribution and overlap of vocabulary in the two groups of articles were analyzed. Some differences between the writings in two areas of science were found.en_US
dc.format.extent1789046 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleLevels of technicality in scientific communicationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMental Health Research Institute, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/21872/1/0000278.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(76)90040-6en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInformation Processing & Managementen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.