Show simple item record

Rater agreements in assigning stanford-binet items to Guilford's structure of intellect operations categories

dc.contributor.authorDyer, Calvin O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNeigler, Cynthiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMilholland, John E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T16:36:38Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T16:36:38Z
dc.date.issued1975en_US
dc.identifier.citationDyer, Calvin O., Neigler, Cynthia, Milholland, John E. (1975)."Rater agreements in assigning stanford-binet items to Guilford's structure of intellect operations categories." Journal of School Psychology 13(2): 114-118. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/22028>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V6G-46R0CT1-M/2/bf64a561d6305fe76024091bf205ff25en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/22028
dc.description.abstractNineteen school psychologists assigned the 142 items in the Form L-M of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale to the five Operations categories of Guilford's Structure of Intellect model, following flow charts prepared for this purpose by Meeker (1965). On the average, one rater agreed with another on about half the items, and their modal assignments agreed with Meeker's (1969) assignments on only 81 (57%) of the items. These levels of agreement are judged not to be high enough to justify classifying Stanford-Binet items in accordance with the Structure of Intellect Operations categories.en_US
dc.format.extent255870 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleRater agreements in assigning stanford-binet items to Guilford's structure of intellect operations categoriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCombined Program in Education and Psychology 2339 SEB University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCombined Program in Education and Psychology 2339 SEB University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumPsychology Department 529 Thompson University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/22028/1/0000445.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(75)90018-7en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of School Psychologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.