Rater agreements in assigning stanford-binet items to Guilford's structure of intellect operations categories
dc.contributor.author | Dyer, Calvin O. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Neigler, Cynthia | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Milholland, John E. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-07T16:36:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-07T16:36:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1975 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Dyer, Calvin O., Neigler, Cynthia, Milholland, John E. (1975)."Rater agreements in assigning stanford-binet items to Guilford's structure of intellect operations categories." Journal of School Psychology 13(2): 114-118. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/22028> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V6G-46R0CT1-M/2/bf64a561d6305fe76024091bf205ff25 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/22028 | |
dc.description.abstract | Nineteen school psychologists assigned the 142 items in the Form L-M of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale to the five Operations categories of Guilford's Structure of Intellect model, following flow charts prepared for this purpose by Meeker (1965). On the average, one rater agreed with another on about half the items, and their modal assignments agreed with Meeker's (1969) assignments on only 81 (57%) of the items. These levels of agreement are judged not to be high enough to justify classifying Stanford-Binet items in accordance with the Structure of Intellect Operations categories. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 255870 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Rater agreements in assigning stanford-binet items to Guilford's structure of intellect operations categories | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Education | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Social Work | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Management | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Combined Program in Education and Psychology 2339 SEB University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Combined Program in Education and Psychology 2339 SEB University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Psychology Department 529 Thompson University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USA | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/22028/1/0000445.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(75)90018-7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of School Psychology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.