Show simple item record

Distribution of bromouracil in the pyrimidine oligonucleotides of drosophila DNA

dc.contributor.authorRizki, Rose M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRizki, Tahir M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T16:41:16Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T16:41:16Z
dc.date.issued1975en_US
dc.identifier.citationRizki, Rose M., Rizki, T. M. (1975)."Distribution of bromouracil in the pyrimidine oligonucleotides of drosophila DNA." Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 30(): 343-353. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/22176>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T2C-4C9C1G6-1H/2/fa9e0a21aadb4568a8cac0b1a19181deen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/22176
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=811984&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractDNA was isolated from Drosophila melanogaster larvae fed radioactive thymidine (TdR), bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR), or one of these nucleosides together with 5-fluorouracil (FU) under identical conditions. The four DNA samples designated T-DNA, B-DNA, T(F)-DNA, and B(F)-DNA respectively were hydrolyzed with formic acid-diphenylamine, and the pyrimidine oligonucleotides of various chain lengths (isostichs) were fractionated by DEAF-cellulose chromatography. The distributions of the labeled thymine and bromouracil (BU) residues among the pyrimidine isostichs were determined, and compared for the four DNAs. These comparisons indicated the following: 1. (1) Similarity of T-DNA and T(F)-DNA with respect to labeled thymine distribution among the pyrimidine isostichs (using the mononucleotide to pentanucleotide tracts for statistical comparisons) showed that TdR entering DNA synthesis via the salvage pathway has the same distribution whether the synthetic pathway is operating normally or is inhibited by FU treatment.2. (2) Quantitative comparison of the distribution of BU among the isostichs of B-DNA. and B(F)-DNA with the distribution of labeled thymine in T-DNA showed significant differences, indicating that the organism does not accept BUdR indiscriminately at all thymine sites for DNA synthesis.3. (3) Comparison of the distribution of BU in B-DNA and B(F)-DNA showed that isostichs 1 and 3 differ significantly. The elution profiles of the isostichs also differed qualitatively between these DNAs. This analysis confirms differential incorporation of BUdR into Drosophila DNA in the presence of a thymidylate inhibitor.The observations on BUdR incorporation in Drosophila DNA have been discussed with relation to the high frequency of somatic cell mutations induced in imaginal disc cells by treatment with the analog in the presence of inhibitors of thymidylate synthetase.en_US
dc.format.extent802830 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleDistribution of bromouracil in the pyrimidine oligonucleotides of drosophila DNAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeneticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid811984en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/22176/1/0000607.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(75)90373-5en_US
dc.identifier.sourceMutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesisen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.