Show simple item record

Comparison of DC and RF for lesioning white and grey matter

dc.contributor.authorDiCara, Leo V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeaver, Lindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Georgeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T16:46:35Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T16:46:35Z
dc.date.issued1974-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationDicara, Leo V., Weaver, Linda, Wolf, George (1974/06)."Comparison of DC and RF for lesioning white and grey matter." Physiology &amp; Behavior 12(6): 1087-1090. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/22350>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T0P-484M9VH-71/2/3bce98edbc7063384f03b68519d169dfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/22350
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=4598937&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe morphology of brain lesions produced by anodal direct current and by radio frequency current was compared. The lesions were placed within or adjacent to number of myelinated fiber tracts of the forebrain and brain stem using a range of common current parameters. It was found that with the parameters used anodal current was relatively ineffective for destroying fiber tracts while radio frequency was equally effective for fiber tracts and cellular areas. Thus, differential applicabilities of these two lesion methods are indicated. Additional observations were made on the effect of cathode location upon the shape of anodal direct current lesions. There was a tendency for the anodal lesion to be drawn in the direction of the cathode but the effect was small and inconsistent and therefore its usefulness for controlling the shapes of anodal lesions seems minimal.en_US
dc.format.extent358099 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleComparison of DC and RF for lesioning white and grey matteren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Natural Sciences, State University of New York, Purchase, New York 10577, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Natural Sciences, State University of New York, Purchase, New York 10577, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Natural Sciences, State University of New York, Purchase, New York 10577, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid4598937en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/22350/1/0000796.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(74)90161-9en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePhysiology &amp; Behavioren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.