Show simple item record

In-vitro evaluation in man of immunostimulation by subfractions of Actinomyces viscosus

dc.contributor.authorLopatin, Dennis E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeebles, Frances L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWoods, R. W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSyed, Salam A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T17:28:03Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T17:28:03Z
dc.date.issued1980en_US
dc.identifier.citationLopatin, D. E., Peebles, Frances L., Woods, R. W., Syed, Salam A. (1980)."In-vitro evaluation in man of immunostimulation by subfractions of Actinomyces viscosus." Archives of Oral Biology 25(1): 23-29. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23350>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T4J-4BXXY18-61/2/bf0a77ee29e2df81160b2addab7ce539en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23350
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=6931554&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractActinomyces viscosus was fractionated into cell wall (PEL) and intracellular supernatant (SUP) fractions following ultrasonication. In vitro lymphocyte transformation induced by each fraction was assessed using the lymphocytes obtained from subjects with minimal periodontal disease. In kinetic experiments, a detectable blastogenic response to both fractions was measured by the fourth day, with a peak at day 7. Nuclease treatment enhanced the immunostimulatory activity of the PEL fraction 5.5-fold over untreated PEL; it had no effect on the activity of SUP. Although pronase treatment had no effect on the PEL fractions, it abrogated the ability of SUP to activate lymphocytes. Fractions of nuclease-treated and untreated SUP were batch-eluted from DEAE-sepharose columns with increasing concentrations of NaCl, producing 3 major stimulatory subfractions which accounted for 75 per cent of the activity of unfractionated SUP. Comparisons of lymphocyte responses to the DEAE-fractionated SUP indicated that not all individuals responded equally to each subfraction. As there was a differential responsiveness to the various antigenic components, detailed evaluation of the antigens of A. viscosus is warranted to define differences in antigen responsiveness in individuals with differing severities of periodontal disease.en_US
dc.format.extent761050 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleIn-vitro evaluation in man of immunostimulation by subfractions of Actinomyces viscosusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Oral Biology and Dental Research Institute, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Oral Biology and Dental Research Institute, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Oral Biology and Dental Research Institute, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Oral Biology and Dental Research Institute, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid6931554en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/23350/1/0000293.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(80)90151-Xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceArchives of Oral Biologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.