Show simple item record

Techniques for defining geographic boundaries for health regions

dc.contributor.authorThomas, J. Williamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T17:39:34Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T17:39:34Z
dc.date.issued1979en_US
dc.identifier.citationThomas, J. William (1979)."Techniques for defining geographic boundaries for health regions." Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 13(6): 321-326. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23714>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V6Y-45DHT3W-61/2/29dcc9af8d30f134242047ea500cab9den_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23714
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10297643&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractMany federal and state programs require the geographic partitioning of states into regions for health services planning, monitoring, and/or administration. A common consideration for such programs is that region boundaries should be drawn so as to maximize the proportion of the state's population that receives health care services in its region of residence. Defining region boundaries thus may be viewed as a problem of partitioning a set of N small areal units (e.g. counties) into M subsets (regions) so as to minimize interactions (patient flow) among subsets. This paper describes three algorithms for region design and compares them in terms of computer-processing efficiency and solution value based on results from a number of test cases. Application of two of the algorithms, one based on the greedy heuristic and the other incorporating a max-flow/min-cut procedure, to a problem of dividing a metropolitan region into separate service areas for clusters of hospitals is also described.en_US
dc.format.extent777869 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleTechniques for defining geographic boundaries for health regionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Medical Care Organization, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 109 Observatory Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid10297643en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/23714/1/0000686.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(79)90013-2en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSocio-Economic Planning Sciencesen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.