View Item 

Show simple item record

Confirmation of metastases by fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with gynecologic malignancies
dc.contributor.authorFlint, Andrewen_US
dc.contributor.authorTerhart, Kathleenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMurad, Tariq M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Peyton T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T17:45:48Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T17:45:48Z
dc.date.issued1982-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationFlint, Andrew, Terhart, Kathleen, Murad, Tariq M., Taylor, Peyton T. (1982/12)."Confirmation of metastases by fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with gynecologic malignancies." Gynecologic Oncology 14(3): 382-391. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23788>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WG6-4C4NX4V-SM/2/c9cfa1272e83ab6f819d03453f34c5f5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23788
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=7152367&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractFine needle aspirations (FNA) were performed on 48 patients treated for gynecologic malignancies and suspected of having recurrence of their disease. The suspected sites of metastases were peripheral lymph nodes (38 patients) and the retroperitoneal region (10 patients). Metastatic tumors were detected in 22 out of the 48 patients (45%) by FNA, with 9 patients having additional confirmation by excisional biopsies. Of the remaining patients, 9 had unsatisfactory specimens, and 2 had false-negative results. The report emphasizes the efficacy of this procedure, especially when positive results are obtained. Open biopsy can be restricted to those patients with negative or unsatisfactory results and a high clinical suspicion of metastasis.en_US
dc.format.extent2125015 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleConfirmation of metastases by fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with gynecologic malignanciesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOphthalmologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid7152367en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/23788/1/0000026.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(82)90113-5en_US
dc.identifier.sourceGynecologic Oncologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
0000026.pdf
Size:
2.026MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.