Show simple item record

Qualitative interpretation and sampling validity of peer recognition study

dc.contributor.authorCrickman, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBarr, Charlesen_US
dc.contributor.authorKochen, Manfreden_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T17:47:43Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T17:47:43Z
dc.date.issued1982-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationCrickman, R., Barr, C., Kochen, M. (1982/10)."Qualitative interpretation and sampling validity of peer recognition study." Social Science Information Studies 2(4): 205-209. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23847>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X20-45K4SB8-1P/2/b6cb86511bd25c2251ef40ed8001c5c6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23847
dc.description.abstractIn an examination of limitations to a previous study, it was found that there was no significant difference between respondents and non-respondents with regard to country or eminence of institution. Observations from non-respondents illustrate possible constraints on the interpretation of responses.en_US
dc.format.extent386622 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleQualitative interpretation and sampling validity of peer recognition studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/23847/1/0000086.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0143-6236(82)90044-8en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSocial Science Information Studiesen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.