Show simple item record

The informational basis of social judgments: Operations in forming an impression of another person

dc.contributor.authorBurnstein, Eugeneen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchul, Yaacoven_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T17:52:23Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T17:52:23Z
dc.date.issued1982-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationBurnstein, Eugene, Schul, Yaacov (1982/05)."The informational basis of social judgments: Operations in forming an impression of another person." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 18(3): 217-234. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23992>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WJB-4D6YWPR-6V/2/2379b66cbb8c9723f1ddbc26995352a3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23992
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes four functionally distinct operations carried out in forming an impression of another person: Initial encoding, elaborative encoding, integration, and decision. These processes were identified empirically on the basis of their differential sensitivity to the amount and the consistency of information in a trait description. In Study 1 as the trait set increased in size, processing was hindered to the greatest extent during initial encoding, to a moderate extent during elaborative encoding, and least during the integration-decision interval. Varying consistency produced the opposite pattern of results, that is, an inconsistent trait description hindered processing the least during initial encoding, a moderate amount during elaborative encoding, and the most during the integration-decision interval. In Study 2 the quantity of information was manipulated via implicit knowledge, that is, the associative structure activated by the trait (rather than set size). Because implicit information is "preintegrated," implication-rich traits did not hinder initial or elaborative encoding more than implication-poor traits. The decision operation, however, was performed more rapidly with implication-rich traits than with implication-poor ones, which strongly suggests that once information is intergrated, the "richer" the representation, the easier it is to arrive at a decision.en_US
dc.format.extent1243596 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleThe informational basis of social judgments: Operations in forming an impression of another personen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/23992/1/0000241.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90051-8en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Experimental Social Psychologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.