Show simple item record

A decision-making process for planning patient education

dc.contributor.authorStrodtman, Linda K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T18:33:50Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T18:33:50Z
dc.date.issued1984en_US
dc.identifier.citationStrodtman, Linda K. (1984)."A decision-making process for planning patient education." Patient Education and Counseling 5(4): 189-200. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/24980>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TBC-4CYGBWH-16/2/b133f07119ca29daf956c46a4ab45e09en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/24980
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10299517&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractHealth professionals tend to resist incorporating education into their patient-care activities despite increasing evidence that educating patients in self-care management can favorably influence health outcomes. More-over, health professionals often lack skill and expertise in developing patient-education plans. To remedy this situation a new method was developed for teaching health professionals how to integrate patient education into the patient's plan of care. Using the guided design approach, a project was adapted to teach health professionals how to plan patient education for the person with diabetes mellitus. In this method health professionals work as members of a team to address a particular patient's educational needs in a real-life situation.More than 250 health professionals have participated in a two-hour workshop utilizing this project. It provides participants with a systematic approach for planning patient education and gives them practice in writing an individualized patient-education plan that takes into consideration the patient's overall needs and goals. This instructional method not only has helped health professionals differentiate patient goals (outcomes) from health professional actions (process) but also has provided health professionals with the opportunity to learn how to work together. The benefit of the "team experience" was the one participants most often identified as having the greatest value.This paper includes a description of the project, a copy of the guided design tool, and specific instructions for its use to enable others to try this method.en_US
dc.format.extent1586488 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleA decision-making process for planning patient educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMedical Nursing Service and School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid10299517en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/24980/1/0000407.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(84)90179-4en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePatient Education and Counselingen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.