Show simple item record

A dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loads

dc.contributor.authorFreivalds, Andrisen_US
dc.contributor.authorChaffin, Don B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarg, Arunen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kwan S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T18:34:21Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T18:34:21Z
dc.date.issued1984en_US
dc.identifier.citationFreivalds, Andris, Chaffin, Don B., Garg, Arun, Lee, Kwan S. (1984)."A dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loads." Journal of Biomechanics 17(4): 251-262. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/24994>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T82-4C06GNX-2R/2/c56aed9b50590f5273dfb138d0b317f2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/24994
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=6736062&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractA biomechanical evaluation of the job-related stresses imposed upon a worker is a potential means of reducing the high incidence rates of manual material handling injuries in industry. A biomechanical model consisting of seven rigid links joined at six articulations has been developed for this purpose. Using data from cinematographic analysis of lifting motions the model calculates: (1) body position from articulation angles, (2) angular velocities and acceleration, (3) inertial moments and forces, and (4) reactive moments and forces at each articulation, including the L5/S1 joint.Results indicated effects of the common task variables. Larger load and box sizes increased the rise times and peak values of both vertical ground reaction forces and predicted L5/S1 compressive forces. However, boxes with handles resulted in higher L5/S1 compressive forces than for boxes without handles. Also, in lifting the larger boxes the subjects did not sufficiently compensate with reduced box weights in order to maintain uniform L5/S1 compressive forces. Smoothed and rectified EMG of erector spinae muscles correlated significantly with L5/S1 compressive forces, while predicted and measured vertical ground reaction forces also correlated significantly, indicating the validity of the model as a tool for predicting job physical stresses.en_US
dc.format.extent1047853 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleA dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loadsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelKinesiology and Sportsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Ergonomics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Ergonomics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid6736062en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/24994/1/0000421.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(84)90136-2en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Biomechanicsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.