Show simple item record

The validity of police reported accident data

dc.contributor.authorShinar, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorTreat, John R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Stephen T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T18:42:02Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T18:42:02Z
dc.date.issued1983-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationShinar, David, Treat, John R., McDonald, Stephen T. (1983/06)."The validity of police reported accident data." Accident Analysis &amp; Prevention 15(3): 175-191. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/25202>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V5S-4692RGH-S/2/6a535f6a375b719fc94d2e033e914587en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/25202
dc.description.abstractInformation theory and signal detection theory techniques were used to assess the validity of police reported traffic accident data. The validity criteria were the data and conclusions of multi-disciplinary accident investigation teams who investigated the same traffic accidents. The results indicated that the accident level variables reported by the police with least reliability were vertical road character, accident severity, and road surface composition. The most reliably reported data were those concerned with the accident location, date, and number of drivers, passengers, and vehicles. The informativeness of the police reports with respect to driver/vehicle characteristics was practically nil, with the exception of driver age, sex and vehicle model for which the police were correct most of the time (but not errorless). It was also found that police reports provided very little information regarding the presence of different human conditions and states, vehicle defects and environmental/road deficiencies. The sensitivity of police investigators to all accident causes was low. When causes were categorized into human direct, human indirect (conditions and states) vehicle, and environmental, police were the most reliable with respect to human direct causes and the least reliable with respect to environmental and human indirect causes. Implications for improvement and use of police data are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent1788787 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleThe validity of police reported accident dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumHighway Safety Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84120, Israelen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstitute for Research in Public Safety, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/25202/1/0000641.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(83)90018-0en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAccident Analysis &amp; Preventionen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.