Show simple item record

Comparison of fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules of maintenance of stimulant drug-reinforced responding

dc.contributor.authorWinger, Gail D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWoods, James H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T19:05:04Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T19:05:04Z
dc.date.issued1985-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationWinger, Gail, Woods, James H. (1985/05)."Comparison of fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules of maintenance of stimulant drug-reinforced responding." Drug and Alcohol Dependence 15(1-2): 123-130. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/25672>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T63-4BWFC6M-FY/2/94a99cb69a0b3526ca1d75cff6eebe07en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/25672
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=4017869&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe effectiveness of doses of i.v. cocaine and nomifensine in maintaining lever-press responding in rhesus monkeys was evaluated under two schedules, fixed- and progressive-ratio (FR, PR). The doses that maintained maximum rates of responding under the fixed-ratio schedule were 0.32 mg/kg per injection cocaine and 0.10 mg/kg per injection nomifensine. The fixed-ratio rates maintained by this dose of nomifensine were slightly lower than those maintained by cocaine. Under the progressive-ratio schedule, the maximum response rates developed with 0.32 mg/kg per injection cocaine and 0.32 mg/kg per injection nomifensine. Maximum performances under the progressive ratio were slightly higher with cocaine than with nomifensine. Taken in conjunction with existing data for other drugs and conditions, these data indicate that progressive-ratio schedules may yield information on the relative reinforcing effects of drugs that differs only slightly from that obtained with fixed-ratio schedules.en_US
dc.format.extent617022 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleComparison of fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules of maintenance of stimulant drug-reinforced respondingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartments of Pharmacology and Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartments of Pharmacology and Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid4017869en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/25672/1/0000225.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0376-8716(85)90036-5en_US
dc.identifier.sourceDrug and Alcohol Dependenceen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.