Parallel computation and the mind-body problem
dc.contributor.author | Thagard, Paul R. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-07T19:29:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-07T19:29:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1986 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Thagard, Paul (1986)."Parallel computation and the mind-body problem." Cognitive Science 10(3): 301-318. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/26122> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W48-4F5V7H8-3/2/a1637277a37e9ba8e9733874618ef4b3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/26122 | |
dc.description.abstract | The position in the philosophy of mind called functionalism claims that mental states are to be understood in terms of their functional relationships to other mental states, not in terms of their material instantiation in any particular kind of hardware. But the argument that material instantiation is irrelevant to functional relationships is computationally naive. This paper uses recent work on parallel computation to argue that software and hardware are much more intertwined than the functionalists allow. Parallelism offers qualitative as well as quantitative advantages, leading to different styles of programming as well as increased speed. Hence hardware may well matter to the mental: only by further empirical investigations of the relation between the mind and brain and between artificial intelligence software and underlying hardware will we be able to achieve a defensible solution to the mind-body problem. The major disadvantage of parallel systems is the need to coordinate their subprocesses, but recent proposals that consciousness provides a serial control for parallel computation are implausible. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1262831 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Parallel computation and the mind-body problem | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan-Dearborn Princeton University, USA | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26122/1/0000198.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Cognitive Science | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.