Show simple item record

Improving emission-computed-tomography quantification by Compton-scatter rejection through offset windows

dc.contributor.authorKoral, Kenneth F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorClinthorne, Neal H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLeslie Rogers, W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T19:35:41Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T19:35:41Z
dc.date.issued1986-01-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationKoral, Kenneth F., Clinthorne, Neal H., Leslie Rogers, W. (1986/01/15)."Improving emission-computed-tomography quantification by Compton-scatter rejection through offset windows." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 242(3): 610-614. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/26299>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TJM-470F5NS-129/2/43954a9f7cb0c99248c6eb757e12e90cen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/26299
dc.description.abstractHistorically in nuclear medicine the acceptance window for total-energy pulse-height has been set to maximize contrast and resolution in the image. Recently, there has been increased emphasis on quantification of digital images to calculate, for example, left ventricular volume or tumor radiation absorbed dose. In this paper, we consider specifically what improvements can be made in emission computed tomography simply by employing a window which is offset to the high-energy side of the photopeak in order to reduce the contribution of Compton scattered gamma-rays. The window is offset so as to reduce the count rate for a source in air by 20%. Two lucite phantoms were measured. One was a short cylinder filled with a uniformly-distributed solution of 99mTc in water. The other was a head phantom with a 0.6 cm3 "tumor" containing 99mTc. Water surrounding the tumor could be nonradioactive or contain a dilute background activity. Absolute calibration was accomplished by imaging the simulated tumor in the air-filled phantom. With the offset window, calculated tumor activity is only 3% and 7% high without and with background respectively compared to 20% and 26% high with the symmetric window. However, total activity of the entire slice is still 37% high even without background. For the cylinder containing uniform activity, the error in specific activity drops from 30% to 18% with the offset window. Therefore, an asymmetric window significantly improves quantification, and for certain cases such as an isolated tumor, may be sufficiently accurate without further correction.en_US
dc.format.extent372738 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleImproving emission-computed-tomography quantification by Compton-scatter rejection through offset windowsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26299/1/0000384.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(86)90475-4en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipmenten_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.