Phylogenetic analysis and fossil plants
dc.contributor.author | Stein, Jr. , William E. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-07T19:57:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-07T19:57:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1987-02 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Stein, Jr., William E. (1987/02)."Phylogenetic analysis and fossil plants." Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 50(1-2): 31-61. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/26812> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V6W-48F0238-CH/2/87abc9c476e5283f4892d260227dd67a | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/26812 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a perspective on the relationship between cladistic methods and the study of fossil plants. Paleobotany has been slow in evaluating the potential of these and other explicit methods compared to other branches of systematics. However, the unique or particularly difficult problems paleobotanists face make more interesting, rather than prohibit, their application. A model of a cladistic approach to phylogenetic analysis is introduced in order to evaluate what role fossils, including fossil plants, should play in phylogenetic analysis. Major elements of the model include sets of hypotheses about useful systematic comparison, phylogenetic relationship, evolutionary pattern and process, and age, linked by recursive directional arguments. Arguments at one level only, those linking characters with the cladogram, are viewed as being strictly deductive. Character hypotheses at the highest level are distinguished by the term "cladistic character". When cladistic characters are compatible, estimates of phylogeny suggested by each may be readily combined into a summary result. However, character conflict is common and represents a major challenge to the ultimate success of cladistic methods. The main advantage of cladistic characters lies in the attempt to separate out portions of complex phylogenetic hypotheses for independent scrutiny and debate. Under the model of phylogenetic analysis presented here, it is argued that fossils provide morphological information, not obtainable by other means of inquiry, which may have a profound effect on our view of characters and relationship. Fossils also provide estimates of age useful in two distinct ways. The first involves using age estimates of states, combined with external criteria such as out-group analysis, in providing defensible proximity and polarity proposals for cladistic characters. The second involves using age estimates of entire taxa to judge historical plausibility of a set of phylogenetic hypotheses generated from a cladogram. Incompatible characters may also be analyzed in this way, allowing evaluation of the plausibility of alternative character formulations. The use of fossils in phylogenetic analysis tends to emphasize the necessity of coming to terms explicitly with the ancestor-descendant relationship in cladistic methods. It is proposed that, when properly formulated, the relationship is similar in structure to other phylogenetic hypotheses and at least partly addressed by the hypothetico-deductive format. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 2920861 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Phylogenetic analysis and fossil plants | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Anthropology and Archaeology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A. | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26812/1/0000370.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-6667(87)90039-X | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.