View Item 

Show simple item record

What's left is closer to right : A response to keating
dc.contributor.authorByrnes, James P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T20:07:39Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T20:07:39Z
dc.date.issued1988-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationByrnes, James P. (1988/12)."What's left is closer to right : A response to keating." Developmental Review 8(4): 385-392. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27044>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WDH-4D5XDD7-62/2/95ca7e329ab2906e5d7ace321337f5fcen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27044
dc.description.abstractThe present paper attempts to respond to criticisms made by Keating (1988, Developmental Review, 8, 376-384) regarding the present author's earlier paper which described a recasted model of formal operations ( Byrnes, 1988, Developmental Review, 8, 66-87). This earlier paper made a distinction between conceptual and procedural knowledge at the level of formal operations, and presented evidence supporting this recasted model. Keating (1988) argues that the recasted model fails to capture what Piaget originally intended, that it fails to incorporate a procedural knowledge component, and that there is some question as to what would constitute empirical support for the model. The present paper discusses each of these criticisms and others in turn, and clarifies earlier arguments.en_US
dc.format.extent595963 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleWhat's left is closer to right : A response to keatingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27044/1/0000033.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(88)90017-2en_US
dc.identifier.sourceDevelopmental Reviewen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
0000033.pdf
Size:
581.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.