Show simple item record

High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of 32P-postlabeled DNA-aromatic carcinogen adducts

dc.contributor.authorLevy, Gerald N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Wendell W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T20:09:30Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T20:09:30Z
dc.date.issued1988-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationLevy, Gerald N., Weber, Wendell W. (1988/11/01)."High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of 32P-postlabeled DNA-aromatic carcinogen adducts." Analytical Biochemistry 174(2): 381-392. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27086>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W9V-4DYM9HN-R3/2/b13dbaedfeaa8538ce3444473a47a100en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27086
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=3239743&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe technique of 32P postlabeling of DNA-carcinogen adducts is a useful and extremely sensitive method of detecting and quantitating DNA damage by carcinogens. We have adapted the 32P method to analysis by high-pressure liquid chromatography, making the procedure more rapid and convenient than when thin-layer chromatography is used. Following DNA isolation and hydrolysis, nucleotide-carcinogen adducts are enhanced relative to normal nucleotides by solvent extraction and then labeled with high-specific-activity [[gamma]-32P]ATP. The resulting 32P-postlabeled nucleotides are resolved by reverse-phase ion-pair HPLC. After as little as 3 h of exposure to carcinogens, DNA adducts can be demonstrated from 1 [mu]g or less of mouse hepatic DNA. Acetylated and nonacetylated adducts can be resolved from hepatic DNA of mice treated with 2-aminofluorene. Differences in DNA damage as measured by adduct formation were demonstrated between "rapid" and "slow" acetylator mouse strains. Rapid-acetylator C57BL/6J mice had three times the amount of hepatic DNA adducts as slow-acetylator A/J mice 3 h after a 60 mg/kg dose of 2-aminofluorene. 4-Aminobiphenyl and 2-naphthylamine each showed an adduct peak with retention time similar to that of the nonacetylated 2-aminofluorene adduct, while benzidine gave a major adduct that eluted somewhat earlier as would be expected for an acetylated adduct. The alkenylbenzenes, safrole and methyleugenol, also formed DNA adducts detectable by this method. DNA prepared from skin of mice painted with benzo[a]pyrene also contained carcinogen-DNA adducts detectable and resolvable by HPLC analysis following 32P postlabeling. The combination of HPLC with 32P postlabeling appears to be a useful technique for the rapid detection and quantitation of DNA damage caused by several classes of aromatic carcinogens.en_US
dc.format.extent986199 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleHigh-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of 32P-postlabeled DNA-aromatic carcinogen adductsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid3239743en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27086/1/0000077.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(88)90037-1en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnalytical Biochemistryen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.