The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories
dc.contributor.author | Gelman, Susan A. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-07T20:27:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-07T20:27:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1988-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Gelman, Susan A. (1988/01)."The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories." Cognitive Psychology 20(1): 65-95. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27462> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WCR-4D6YVP4-4/2/6868ec54937feefc7d5a27ebb1268e94 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27462 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=3338268&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Recent studies have shown that children as young as age 31/2 use category membership as the basis of their inductive inferences. The present studies examine how children determine which category-based inductive inferences are warranted and which are unwarranted. Preschool and elementary school children learned various facts (e.g., "This apple has pectin inside") and reported whether they thought the facts generalized to other items varying in similarity to the target (e.g., other apples, a banana, and a stereo). Categories included both natural kinds and artifacts and varied as to how similar category members were to one another (category homogeneity, as rated by adults). Results indicate that even the youngest children placed certain constraints on their inferences. However, the preschoolers made few principled distinctions among categories, basing their inferences primarily on category homogeneity. In contrast, older children made several distinctions that seemed based on domain-specific knowledge. Most importantly, they drew more inferences within natural kinds than within artifact categories, at times even overextending the distinction. Comparison with other research suggests that increasing scientific knowledge exerts powerful effects on patterns of induction within basic-level categories. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 2431634 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, U.S.A. | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 3338268 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27462/1/0000503.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(88)90025-4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Cognitive Psychology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.