Show simple item record

Radiolabeled antibodies, albumin and antimony sulfide colloid: A comparison as lymphoscintigraphic agents

dc.contributor.authorWahl, Richard L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiebert, Monicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Barry S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPetry, Neil A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T20:30:17Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T20:30:17Z
dc.date.issued1988en_US
dc.identifier.citationWahl, Richard L., Liebert, Monica, Wilson, Barry S., Petry, Neil A. (1988)."Radiolabeled antibodies, albumin and antimony sulfide colloid: A comparison as lymphoscintigraphic agents." International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part B. Nuclear Medicine and Biology 15(3): 243-247. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27517>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B7GH9-4C00N6Y-1K/2/f1733657e28cf69ac46c46f632ef5f51en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27517
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=3384672&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe kinetics of lymph node and systemic uptake of members of three different classes of lymphoscintigraphic agents were studied in normal laboratory rats. 99mTc antimony trisulfide colloid (TcSbC), 99mTc human serum albumin (TcHSA), 125I 5G6.4 (a murine IgG2ak monoclonal antibody), 125I 763.24T (a murine IgG1), and 125I FT166 (a murine IgM monoclonal) all current or potential lymphoscintigraphic agents, were injected subcutaneously into the hind foot pads of healthy rats. Ipsilateral and contralateral popliteal lymph nodes were sampled up to 4 h post-injection. Subcutaneous injection resulted in far higher nodal uptake for all agents than i.v. delivery with ipsilateral popliteal node/blood ratios 1 h postsubcutaneous injection of: for TcSbC (1900)&gt;125I IgM (497)&gt;TcHSA (72)&gt;125I Intact IgG2a or 125I IgG1 at approximately 10. Thus, while all agents achieve popliteal node/blood ratios far greater than unity, TcSbc has the greatest absolute and relative nodal accumulation, greater than the 125I IgM monoclonal antibody and TcHSA. Uptake of the intact 125I IgG antibodies is lowest. These data suggest that TcSbC in particular, as well as TcHSA and IgM may be most useful as non-specific nodel imaging agents, while the lower background activity of the IgGs may make targeting specific antigen in nodes more feasible.en_US
dc.format.extent842636 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleRadiolabeled antibodies, albumin and antimony sulfide colloid: A comparison as lymphoscintigraphic agentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0028, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0028, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0028, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0028, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid3384672en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27517/1/0000561.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-2897(88)90102-Xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part B. Nuclear Medicine and Biologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.