ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work
dc.contributor.author | Radecki, Patricia M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Swales, John M. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-07T20:31:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-07T20:31:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1988 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Radecki, Patricia M., Swales, John M. (1988)."ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work." System 16(3): 355-365. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27547> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VCH-46JGY1F-8/2/3bebf54d12c0eae3a3f8f9a9f68275f8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27547 | |
dc.description.abstract | Although studies of instructor response to student writing are numerous in both L1 and L2 contexts, the literature on student reaction to those comments is small in L2 research. Partly for this reason, we have examined ESL students' own preferences and views on feedback. We surveyed the attitudes of 59 students in four ESL-oriented classes. Our questionnaire elicited their opinions on the usefulness of various types of comments, the scope of teacher markings, responsibility in error marking and correction, and revision. Eight students were then selected for interview (either audio- or video-taped). The respondents can be divided into three categories, primarily according to their degrees of acceptance of revision and of teacher intervention in providing input: Receptors (46%), Semi-resistors (41%), and Resistors (13%). The survey revealed that as students progress from English language learners to apprentices in their chosen discipline, the more restricted is the role they assign to the language teacher. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 696362 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Linguistics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Education | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Humanities | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27547/1/0000591.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(88)90078-4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | System | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.