Show simple item record

ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work

dc.contributor.authorRadecki, Patricia M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSwales, John M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T20:31:43Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T20:31:43Z
dc.date.issued1988en_US
dc.identifier.citationRadecki, Patricia M., Swales, John M. (1988)."ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work." System 16(3): 355-365. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27547>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VCH-46JGY1F-8/2/3bebf54d12c0eae3a3f8f9a9f68275f8en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27547
dc.description.abstractAlthough studies of instructor response to student writing are numerous in both L1 and L2 contexts, the literature on student reaction to those comments is small in L2 research. Partly for this reason, we have examined ESL students' own preferences and views on feedback. We surveyed the attitudes of 59 students in four ESL-oriented classes. Our questionnaire elicited their opinions on the usefulness of various types of comments, the scope of teacher markings, responsibility in error marking and correction, and revision. Eight students were then selected for interview (either audio- or video-taped). The respondents can be divided into three categories, primarily according to their degrees of acceptance of revision and of teacher intervention in providing input: Receptors (46%), Semi-resistors (41%), and Resistors (13%). The survey revealed that as students progress from English language learners to apprentices in their chosen discipline, the more restricted is the role they assign to the language teacher.en_US
dc.format.extent696362 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleESL student reaction to written comments on their written worken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLinguisticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27547/1/0000591.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(88)90078-4en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSystemen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.