Show simple item record

Cross-cultural differences in driver risk-perception

dc.contributor.authorSivak, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSoler, Joseen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrankle, Ulrichen_US
dc.contributor.authorSpagnhol, Jane Mariaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T20:44:52Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T20:44:52Z
dc.date.issued1989-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationSivak, Michael, Soler, Jose, Trankle, Ulrich, Spagnhol, Jane Maria (1989/08)."Cross-cultural differences in driver risk-perception." Accident Analysis &amp; Prevention 21(4): 355-362. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27832>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V5S-4698MD1-34/2/3525c9581a9cefad4221a4c51fb4fdf5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27832
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2765078&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated differences in risk-perception among U.S., Spanish, West German, and Brazilian drivers. Subjects estimated the risk involved in slide-projected traffic scenes. The scenes, photographed in the United States and Spain, were rated for the amount of risk by using a seven-point scale. The subject groups in each country included younger, middle-aged, and older nonprofessional drivers, as well as middle-aged professional (bus, taxi, or truck) drivers. In the data analyses, the independent variables were subjects' country, age, professional driving experience, and sex, and 23 dichotomously coded characteristics of the traffic scenes. The following are the main findings: (1) Spanish drivers reported the highest risk, while U.S. drivers reported the lowest risk; (2) younger drivers tended to report lower risk than middle-aged and older drivers; (3) nineteen of the 23 analysed characteristics of traffic scenes contributed significantly to risk ratings, even after simultaneously controlling for the effects of all other scene characteristics; (4) ten scene characteristics had a differential effect on the risk ratings in the four tested countries; (5) two scene characteristics had a differential effect on the risk ratings in the four tested subject groups; (6) none of the variables affected differentially the risk ratings of professional vs. nonprofessional drivers and males vs. females. These findings provide information concerning the desirable country- and age-specific emphasis in driver education, driver licensing, and public information campaigns.en_US
dc.format.extent654232 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleCross-cultural differences in driver risk-perceptionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2150, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe University of Valencia, Faculty of Psychology, Valencia, Spainen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe University of Münster, Institute of Psychology, Münster, Federal Republic of Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Federal University of Uberlandia, Department of Psychology, Uberlandia, Brazilen_US
dc.identifier.pmid2765078en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27832/1/0000238.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(89)90026-2en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAccident Analysis &amp; Preventionen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.