Show simple item record

Continued circulatory support: effect of epinephrine or dopamine on 24-hour survival and neurologic function in dogs

dc.contributor.authorNatale, JoAnne E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorD'Alecy, Louis G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T20:48:21Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T20:48:21Z
dc.date.issued1989-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationNatale, Joanne E., D'alecy, Louis G. (1989/06)."Continued circulatory support: effect of epinephrine or dopamine on 24-hour survival and neurologic function in dogs." Resuscitation 17(3): 273-286. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27916>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T19-4C06HWD-2P/2/2b733c8b1dfcd404a9ef7f93fc7c82eden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27916
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2548272&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe effects on 24-h survival and neurologic function were compared following continued postresuscitation circulatory support with epinephrine or dopamine. Cardiopulmonary arrest was induced by ventricular fibrillation. After 10 min, resuscitation efforts were initiated including i.v. infusion of either epinephrine (6 [mu]g/kg per min, 11 dogs) or dopamine (10 [mu]g/kg per min, 14 dogs) for continued circulatory support. There was no difference detected in duration of circulatory support, although dogs receiving epinephrine required more lidocaine (3.3 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.3 mg/kg, P = 0.005). Likewise, there was no statistically significant difference detected in MAP or HR between groups at any time tested. However, dogs receiving epinephrine had significantly worse neurologic function at 6 and 12 h postarrest. Mean survival time (20.3 +/- 1.2 vs. 15.3 +/- 1.9 h, P = 0.028) and overall survival (P = 0.027, survival curve analysis) were significantly longer for dogs receiving dopamine. Plasma glucose in the first 6 h postarrest was significantly higher in dogs receiving epinephrine (P = 0.006). These results suggest that the use of epinephrine for continued vasopressor support in cardiopulmonary resuscitation may contribute to decreased survival and poorer neurologic function in this controlled experimental setting. It is reasonable to propose that similar responses to these commonly used circulatory support agents occur clinically. Therefore, continued vasopressor support with dopamine rather than epinephrine may be justified in the setting of cardiac resuscitation.en_US
dc.format.extent1000158 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleContinued circulatory support: effect of epinephrine or dopamine on 24-hour survival and neurologic function in dogsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFamily Medicine and Primary Careen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, The University of Michigan Medical School M7744 Medical Science II, 1301 Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0622, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Physiology, The University of Michigan Medical School M7744 Medical Science II, 1301 Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0622, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid2548272en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27916/1/0000339.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-9572(89)90043-9en_US
dc.identifier.sourceResuscitationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.