Show simple item record

Detection of bone preservation in archaeological and fossil samples

dc.contributor.authorSchoeninger, Margaret J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Katherine M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Matthew L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKingston, John D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T20:49:34Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T20:49:34Z
dc.date.issued1989en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchoeninger, Margaret J., Moore, Katherine M., Murray, Matthew L., Kingston, John D. (1989)."Detection of bone preservation in archaeological and fossil samples." Applied Geochemistry 4(3): 281-292. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27948>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VDG-48C7BCD-5B/2/89b7aa3952d013ae2bfa1298d9c2211ben_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27948
dc.description.abstractSeveral methods for assessing the preservation of the organic and inorganic components of bone are discussed. Aspects of bone composition (i.e. specific trace element concentrations and stable isotope ratios) provided information on diet and health status in prehistoric and fossil humans. Such information is valuable in understanding the evolution of human adaptation but, prior to the analysis of bone, it is necessary to ensure that the biological signature has not been erased during burial or following excavation. The purpose of the present study was to provide relatively quick methods of scanning sets of bones in order to eliminate ones that are not appropriate for analysis. We present the results of powder X-ray diffractometry and a survey of thin sections of human bones recovered from a coastal site in Georgia (U.S.A.) to assess the preservation of biogenic bone mineral and histological structure. Those bone samples which displayed a lack of histological structure also showed X-ray diffraction patterns which deviated markedly from that of fresh bone. We conclude that a survey of thin sections of a small number of samples in any skeletal population is a rapid, dependable means of eliminating bone which has been altered diagenetically. We also present the results of amino acid analysis of "gelatin" collected using two different methods of extracting the organic component in bone. The "gelatin" which resulted from the demineralization of bone pieces in weak acid (1% HCl) consistently showed a pattern of amino acid composition similar to collagen. Conversely, the "gelatin" which resulted by hydrolyzing demineralized bone powder was unreliable in the retention of protein. Thus, use of the former method, rather than C to N ratios or % yield, appears to be the best means of ensuring analysis of material retaining a biological signature. At this point in time, we can identify bone samples appropriate for trace element and stable isotope analysis even though we cannot always identify the diagenetic process or agent involved.en_US
dc.format.extent1290006 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleDetection of bone preservation in archaeological and fossil samplesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeology and Earth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anthropology, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anthropology, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anthropology, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27948/1/0000377.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-2927(89)90030-9en_US
dc.identifier.sourceApplied Geochemistryen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.