Show simple item record

Simple phobia: Evidence for heterogeneity

dc.contributor.authorHimle, Joseph A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcPhee, Kathleen M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Oliver G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCurtis, George C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T20:50:29Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T20:50:29Z
dc.date.issued1989-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationHimle, Joseph A., McPhee, Kathleen, Cameron, Oliver G., Curtis, George C. (1989/04)."Simple phobia: Evidence for heterogeneity." Psychiatry Research 28(1): 25-30. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27973>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TBV-45XSS9D-J/2/65db293bb0443bbe64401856e486cadden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27973
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2740465&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough simple phobia is a residual category in DSM-III, clinical experience suggests at least four subtypes of this group. To test the validity of the subtypes, the authors compared patients with one of four simple phobias subtypes (n: ANIMAL-INSECT = 25, BLOOD-INJURY = 9, SITUATIONAL = 46, CHOKING-VOMIT = 8). Significant sex differences were observed; all animal and insect phobics and seven of eight choking-vomit phobics were female, while the other two groups showed approximately equal numbers of males and females. Mean age of onset was significantly older for situational phobics than animal-insect or blood-injury phobics; choking-vomit probands were intermediate. Frequency of situational phobias differed significantly among relatives of the four proband groups, with highest frequency being found among situational probands. Thus, these clinical and epidemiological variables support the separation of simple phobia into at least these four diagnostic groups.en_US
dc.format.extent473581 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleSimple phobia: Evidence for heterogeneityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumProfessor of Psychiatry, Chief, Adult Service, and Director, Anxiety Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherClinical Social Worker, Anxiety Disorders Program, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherResident in Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAssociate Professor of Psychiatry & Director, Adult Outpatient Psychiatry, and Associate Director, Anxiety Disorders Program, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid2740465en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27973/1/0000405.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)90194-7en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePsychiatry Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.