Show simple item record

Responses of neurons in the lamb nucleus tractus solitarius to stimulation of the caudal oral cavity and epiglottis with different stimulus modalities

dc.contributor.authorSweazey, Robert D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBradley, Robert M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T20:56:54Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T20:56:54Z
dc.date.issued1989-02-20en_US
dc.identifier.citationSweazey, Robert D., Bradley, Robert M. (1989/02/20)."Responses of neurons in the lamb nucleus tractus solitarius to stimulation of the caudal oral cavity and epiglottis with different stimulus modalities." Brain Research 480(1-2): 133-150. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/28140>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6SYR-485PB63-155/2/6f0e36f20071b91166614a06a118ad0fen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/28140
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2713648&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractReceptors located in the posterior oral cavity and on the epiglottis play an important role in the initiation of upper airway reflexes such as swallowing, gagging, coughing and apnea. Peripheral nerves which innervate these receptor areas terminate in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS). We have recorded the resoonses of 61 neurons in the lamb NTS to stimulation of the caudal tongue, palate and epilottis with mechanical, chemical and thermal stimuli and mapped receptive field location. Although there was some overlap in the areas of the NTS from which neurons with oral cavity and epiglottal receptive fields could be recorded, a significant differences was observed in the mean recording sites of the two groups of neurons. Neurons with oral cavity receptive fields were located more rostral, lateral and ventral in the NTS than neurons with receptive fields on the epiglottis. Little convergence of sensory input onto single cells in the NTS was observed between the oral cavity and the epiglottis. Only one NTS neuron had a receptive field in both of these receptor areas. In contrast, a largenumber of neurons with oral cavity receptive fields received input from two receptors areas. These neurons had a receptive field on the tongue which was located directly beneath the receptive field on the palate. Mechanical stimuli were the most effective for neurons with either oral cavity or epiglottal receptive fields and thermal stimuli were the least effective. Neurons which responded to mechanical stimuli responded better to a moving stimulusthan to a punctate one, and large increases in the strength of a punctate stimulus were required to elicit significant increases in response frequency. Most NTS neurons responded to more than one of the stimulus modalities. However, a significant difference in the mean number of stimulus modalities which elicited responses was observed between neurons with oral cavity and epiglottal receptive fields. The number of multimodal neurons with epiglottal receptive fields was higher than those with oral cavity receptive fields. The multimodal nature of neurons which responded to epiglottal or oral cavity stimulation combined with their location in reflexogenic areas of the NTS suggests that these neurons could be important in the integration of afferent input from the oral cavity and upper airway. If these NTS neurons are involved in the control of oral and upper airway reflexes it would be important for them to respond to as many of the stimulus cues as possible and the majority of these neurons do just that.en_US
dc.format.extent1430770 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleResponses of neurons in the lamb nucleus tractus solitarius to stimulation of the caudal oral cavity and epiglottis with different stimulus modalitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid2713648en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/28140/1/0000592.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(89)91576-Xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBrain Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.