Show simple item record

Distribution and kinetics of GABAB binding sites in rat central nervous system: A quantitative autoradiographic study

dc.contributor.authorChu, Dorothy C. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlbin, Roger L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Anne B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPenney, John B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T13:56:11Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T13:56:11Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.citationChu, D. C. M., Albin, R. L., Young, A. B., Penney, J. B. (1990)."Distribution and kinetics of GABAB binding sites in rat central nervous system: A quantitative autoradiographic study." Neuroscience 34(2): 341-357. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/28876>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T0F-4846JXG-FV/2/977c203a01e1d064b98ffc5c83b505deen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/28876
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2159128&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstract[3H]GABA quantitative autoradiography was used to examine the binding kinetics and regional distribution of GABAB receptors in rat brain. The regional distribution was compared to that of GABAA receptors. At 4[deg]C, [3H]GABA binding to GABAB receptors reached equilibrium within 45 min. The association and dissociation rate constants for GABAB binding to outer neocortical layers were 2.87 +/- 0.17 x 105 min-1 M-1 and 0.0966 +/- 0.0118 min-1, respectively, indicating a dissociation constant of 336 +/- 40 nM. Saturation binding studies in the same region yielded a dissociation constant for GABAB receptors of 341 +/-41 nM while that of GABAA receptors was 92 +/- 10 nM. While the affinities of each type of GABA receptor were uniform across brain regions, the maximal number of binding sites for both types of GABA receptor varied across regions. The distributions of the two receptors in rat brain were different in the olfactory bulb, cerebellum, thalamus, neocortex, medial habenula and interpeduncular nucleus. Areas high in GABAB binding included the medial and lateral geniculates, the superior colliculus and certain amygdaloid nuclei. Binding to white matter tracts and ventricles was negligible.The distribution of GABAB receptors was in agreement with previously postulated sites of action of baclofen.en_US
dc.format.extent2403748 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleDistribution and kinetics of GABAB binding sites in rat central nervous system: A quantitative autoradiographic studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Neurology and the Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Neurology and the Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Neurology and the Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Neurology and the Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid2159128en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/28876/1/0000711.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(90)90144-Sen_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeuroscienceen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.