Show simple item record

Characteristics of individuals and long term reproducibility of dietary reports: The Tecumseh diet methodology study

dc.contributor.authorThompson, Frances E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMetzner, Helen Lowen_US
dc.contributor.authorLamphiear, Donald E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHawthorne, Victor M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T13:58:44Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T13:58:44Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.citationThompson, Frances E., Metzner, Helen L., Lamphiear, Donald E., Hawthorne, Victor M. (1990)."Characteristics of individuals and long term reproducibility of dietary reports: The Tecumseh diet methodology study." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 43(11): 1169-1178. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/28941>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T84-4CPMC8T-28/2/13abf8636f2fe501c138b495d7d81f8den_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/28941
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2243254&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractFood frequency reports in 1967-1969 were compared to frequency reports of the same foods asked retrospectively in 1982-1983 about 1967-1969 for 1184 respondents aged 45-64 years in the Tecumseh Community Health Study. The kappa statistic for concordance of the retrospective and baseline reports was used as a summary measure of the individual's ability to reproduce his or her earlier diet report. Reproducibility was estimated for total diet, represented by 83 foods, and for 9 subsets of foods of epidemiologic interest. In bivariate and multivariate analyses, reproducibility was strongly related to stability of diet; those whose diets changed least over the 15-year period had greatest diet reproducibility. Greater total diet reproducibility was also found among men with higher education, among women of &lt; 110% desirable weight reporting no special diet and among women reporting no medications. Consistent with current models of memory, the retrospective report of diet was strongly related to the current report of diet. Agreement between the retrospective and baseline diet reports was greater than agreement between the current and baseline diet reports. This indicates that, as a proxy for past diet, the retrospective report of diet is superior to the current report. Similar relationships were found for the 9 subset of foods.en_US
dc.format.extent1209113 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleCharacteristics of individuals and long term reproducibility of dietary reports: The Tecumseh diet methodology studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.; Human Nutrition Program, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.; Human Nutrition Program, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid2243254en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/28941/1/0000778.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90018-Ken_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Clinical Epidemiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.