View Item 

Show simple item record

Do deviations from radiance-invariance of metameric matches contradict the three pigment theory of foveal trichromacy?
dc.contributor.authorAlpern, Mathewen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Huazhongen_US
dc.contributor.authorNoji, Junen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T13:59:20Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T13:59:20Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlpern, Mathew, Zhang, Huazhong, Noji, Jun (1990)."Do deviations from radiance-invariance of metameric matches contradict the three pigment theory of foveal trichromacy?." Vision Research 30(11): 1539-1553. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/28956>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T0W-4846GCR-39/2/eeb3e4d05ed4ed70b3dda2d0b82e65faen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/28956
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2288073&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractAccording to the pigment theory of matching, metameric matches result from the equation of the rates of photoisomerizations for each of the three classes of cone pigments excited by the two matched fields. If true, matches are radiance-invariant and additive. Tests of the theory in this paper show small but ubiquitous failures in radiance-invariance due to systematic rather than random errors in matching. A choice between two possible explanations for these systematic errors favors the view that in subjects who deliberately or intuitively search for the middle of the matching range, the errors are due to an asymmetry in the Weber fraction for color (Trezona) at low (but not high) levels of retinal illuminance.en_US
dc.format.extent1618127 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleDo deviations from radiance-invariance of metameric matches contradict the three pigment theory of foveal trichromacy?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOphthalmologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid2288073en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/28956/1/0000793.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(90)90142-8en_US
dc.identifier.sourceVision Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
0000793.pdf
Size:
1.543MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.