Distributional assumptions and observed conservatism in the theory of signal detectability
dc.contributor.author | Maloney, Laurence T. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, Ewart A. C. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-10T14:30:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-10T14:30:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1991-12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Maloney, Laurence T., Thomas, Ewart A. C. (1991/12)."Distributional assumptions and observed conservatism in the theory of signal detectability." Journal of Mathematical Psychology 35(4): 443-470. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29011> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WK3-4D7JN7X-5G/2/2a79e51870561673c7d7e7607c512d07 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29011 | |
dc.description.abstract | The theory of signal detectability typically fits data from Yes-No detection experiments by assuming a particular form for the noise and signal plus noise distributions of the Observer. Previous work suggests that estimates of the Observer's sensitivity are little affected by small discrepancies between the assumed distributions (usually Gaussian) and the Observer's true underlying distributions. Possibly for this reason, estimates of the Observer's choice of criterion or likelihood ratio suggesting suboptimal performance have also been taken at face value. It is, for example, commonly accepted that human Observers are conservative: They are said to choose criteria corresponding to likelihood ratios that are closer to 1 than the ratios produced by optimal criteria. We demonstrate that estimates of likelihood ratio can be markedly biased when the distributions assumed in estimation are not the Observer's true distributions. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for an optimal Observer to appear conservative when fitted by distributions different from those governing his choices.These results raise a fundamental question: What information about the Observer's underlying noise and signal plus noise distributions does the Observer's performance in a Yes-No detection task provide? We demonstrate that a small number of isosensitivity (ROC) curves completely determines the Observer's underlying noise and signal plus noise distributions for many familiar forms of the theory of signal detectability. These results open up the possibility of a semiparametric theory of signal detectability. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1763438 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Distributional assumptions and observed conservatism in the theory of signal detectability | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, USA. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Psychology, Stanford University, USA | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29011/1/0000040.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(91)90043-S | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Mathematical Psychology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.