Late Proterozoic paleomagnetism and tectonic models: a critical appraisal
dc.contributor.author | Van der Voo, Rob | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Meert, Joseph G. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-10T14:33:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-10T14:33:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1991-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Van der Voo, Rob, Meert, Joseph G. (1991/10)."Late Proterozoic paleomagnetism and tectonic models: a critical appraisal." Precambrian Research 53(1-2): 149-163. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29100> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VBP-489Y8D2-9T/2/8f0029cacc251bdbf496815dff4e92ab | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29100 | |
dc.description.abstract | Interpretations of Proterozoic orogenic belts in terms of plate tectonic processes have been widely divergent. Published models range between the extremes of no relative motions between continental nuclei (implying ensialic orogenic processes) on the one hand, to large-scale relative motions with oceans opening and closing (resulting in continent-continent collisions) on the other hand. Paleomagnetic data can, in theory, contribute significantly to this debate; however, as shown in this paper, several tectonic interpretations on the basis of paleomagnetic data have been premature. A critical continent in many of the previous models is Africa. In order to test hypotheses, for instance, for the late Proterozoic-Cambrian Pan African orogeny, a compilation of paleopoles has been made for Africa, with age ranges falling fully or partially within the interval of 1150 to 500 Ma. A quantitative comparison of the quality of this African dataset with the Phanerozoic poles for North American and Europe shows that the late Proterozoic paleopoles of Africa generally have very low reliability. It appears that the data from other Gondwana continents are equally unreliable and even less abundant. This means that currently the dataset of Gondwanaland cannot be used with confidence for the testing of tectonic models such as the Precambrian supercontinent, at least for the time after 1150 Ma. Well-dated late Proterozoic paleopoles from the three cratonic nuclei within Africa (Congo, Kalahari, West Africa) define relatively short apparent polar wander path segments, but each with different age ranges. This implies that they cannot be compared with each other to test relative motions between the cratonic nuclei and that a choice between ensialic and ensimatic models for the Pan African orogenic belts cannot yet be based on paleomagnetic data. While this does not imply that the tectonic models (e.g. those of Piper and McWilliams) are wrong, it does mean that substantial paleomagnetic support for them will have to wait more and higher-quality paleopole determinations with better dating precision. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1211154 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Late Proterozoic paleomagnetism and tectonic models: a critical appraisal | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Geology and Earth Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1063, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1063, USA | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29100/1/0000136.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(91)90009-Y | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Precambrian Research | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.